News
Cambridge Residents Slam Council Proposal to Delay Bike Lane Construction
News
‘Gender-Affirming Slay Fest’: Harvard College QSA Hosts Annual Queer Prom
News
‘Not Being Nerds’: Harvard Students Dance to Tinashe at Yardfest
News
Wrongful Death Trial Against CAMHS Employee Over 2015 Student Suicide To Begin Tuesday
News
Cornel West, Harvard Affiliates Call for University to Divest from ‘Israeli Apartheid’ at Rally
Professor Palmer delivered the third lecture of the William Belden Noble series last evening on the subject, "Ethics and the Fine Arts." He said in part:
The good and the beautiful as abstract qualities are in most ways almost inseparable. It has been said that moral philosophers are really no more than connoisseurs of true beauty. True beauty cannot be sinful, for a distinctive quality of beauty and holiness alike is unity, and the distinctive quality of sinfulness is incoherence.
Yet although goodness and beauty are in many ways so closely allied, there is between them a distinction. Beauty as shown in a work of art is complete, isolated, finite. Goodness, on the contrary, cannot be conceived except in "growing" terms, and as never quite capable of reaching the goal of its ambition. This is the distinction between goodness and beauty, and it is in this very finite perfection of a work of art that the defect of beauty lies.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.