News
Amid Boston Overdose Crisis, a Pair of Harvard Students Are Bringing Narcan to the Red Line
News
At First Cambridge City Council Election Forum, Candidates Clash Over Building Emissions
News
Harvard’s Updated Sustainability Plan Garners Optimistic Responses from Student Climate Activists
News
‘Sunroof’ Singer Nicky Youre Lights Up Harvard Yard at Crimson Jam
News
‘The Architect of the Whole Plan’: Harvard Law Graduate Ken Chesebro’s Path to Jan. 6
(The Crimson invites all men in the University to submit signed communications of timely interest. It assumes no responsibility, however, for sentiments expressed under this head and reserves the right to exclude any whose publication would be palpably inappropriate.)
To the Editors of the CRIMSON:
In regard to the election of class officers, I would like to quote the following extract from the constitution of the Junior and Sophomore classes: "There must be at least three nominees for each office. If enough petitions are not received, the Student Council shall make the necessary additional nominations."
However, on the ballots of the present Junior and Sophomore elections, there appeared, in four cases, only two nominees for the office in question. It was after much controversy that the present nominating plan was adopted, and it seems to me that it is only fair to follow out the ruling of the constitution. Else, why have a constitution at all? J. B. FENNO, JR., '21.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.