Following are quotations from some of the relevant sections of the Faculty Committee on Educational Policy's report on "Advising in Harvard College," which is reported on page one.
. . . it is obvious that the great increase since the war in the number of our students, both graduate and undergraduate, without a corresponding increase in faculty, has increased the ratio of students to faculty, increased the enrollment in courses, increased the burdens on the faculty and thus diminished the possibility of individual contact between faculty and students on which advising depends.
. . . one quarter of the student body commands a considerable amount of attention from individual members of the faculty; the remaining three quarters got relatively little attention.
. . . (The advising program, however,) compares favorably with the advising programs in many other colleges and universities.
What the Advising Program Should Be
Advising is an important part of the educational process, essential if the student is to obtain maximum benefit from his college experience. Harvard has, in the last sixty years, clearly committed itself to this proposition . . . (But) advising, in a college which emphasizes independence, maturity and self-education, will not be paternalistic.
The College is concerned with the whole person, with the healthy all-round development of its students . . . Thus an effective advising program will be concerned with emotional problems, moral problems, economic problems, personal relationships, and career and vocational problems. The College's competence and responsibility in dealing with these matters, however, are not as great as they are in dealing with specifically academic problems. . . .
The demand for improved advising stems from more than just a need for better advice narrowly defined. It reflects a need for personal relationships with members of the faculty, a need to be known and valued as individuals with unique qualities, not to be anonymous, one of an undifferentiated mass of students. The Houses provide the most favorable environment for meetingx this need. It is central to our whole concept of a good advising system that the need be met.
. . . a relationship characterized mainly by interest in the student's intellectual development, but at the same time sufficiently easy and personal to give the student the feeling of being known and valued by some member of the faculty.
Harvard's Neglected Students
It is in the five largest departments, however, that the major difficulties lie. In 1948-49 almost 60 percent of Harvard upperclassmen concentrated in Economics, English, Government, History and Social Relations . . . To carry this load, the five departments in question have only 32.7 percent of the total faculty manpower . . .
Each House should have a new officer to be called the Dean of the House, and the present office of Senior Tutor should be eliminated . . .
Survey Stresses Student-Faculty ContactLast Monday the University officially released an impressive 133-page self-criticism called the "Report on Advising in Harvard College." Mixed-up world
Everybody's TutorialThe recent special report on "Advising in Harvard College" attacks with admirable vigor and the roughness the biggest problem of
Gilmore To Lead Tutorial PlannersMyron P. Gilmore, associate professor of History, will head a five-man faculty committee to work out the details of the
Pride of the FinestWithin the last few weeks, a cloud of post-war penury has filled the University's financial skies. Although this gloom seems
3 on Faculty Hit New Tutorial PlanLeaders in three of the University's largest departments last night registered unanimous disapproval with the tutorial provisions in the report