News
Amid Boston Overdose Crisis, a Pair of Harvard Students Are Bringing Narcan to the Red Line
News
At First Cambridge City Council Election Forum, Candidates Clash Over Building Emissions
News
Harvard’s Updated Sustainability Plan Garners Optimistic Responses from Student Climate Activists
News
‘Sunroof’ Singer Nicky Youre Lights Up Harvard Yard at Crimson Jam
News
‘The Architect of the Whole Plan’: Harvard Law Graduate Ken Chesebro’s Path to Jan. 6
Dean Ford said this week that he would be interested in hearing students' opinions on the House election system.
He revealed that the Masters had again been considering a change in the system, which has been in use for at least 20 years. A confidential memorandum from Ford has been given to the Committee on Houses--a group that includes the nine Masters, four deans and one administrative vice-president--urging it to evaluate alternative methods.
Ford pointed out that the Committee has been debating this question for years, but hinted that some change was under serious consideration. Last spring, a special Faculty committee, chaired by J. Petersen Elder, dean of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, evaluated the present system at length.
The Elder committee finally recommended that the element of student choice be preserved, but that the degree to which the Masters of the Houses were involved in the process be reduced. It recommended that Dean Watson's office handle most of the assignment procedure.
Elder's proposal would, however, have permitted a Master to intervene in favor of any undergraduate he particularly wanted to have in his House. After some discussion, the Committee on Houses decided not to implement the scheme. Reportedly, it was the opposition of only two Masters that blocked the proposal.
Yale uses a computer to assign freshmen to the upper-class Colleges, permitting the preference of neither students or Masters to figure in the final decision.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.