News

Cambridge Residents Slam Council Proposal to Delay Bike Lane Construction

News

‘Gender-Affirming Slay Fest’: Harvard College QSA Hosts Annual Queer Prom

News

‘Not Being Nerds’: Harvard Students Dance to Tinashe at Yardfest

News

Wrongful Death Trial Against CAMHS Employee Over 2015 Student Suicide To Begin Tuesday

News

Cornel West, Harvard Affiliates Call for University to Divest from ‘Israeli Apartheid’ at Rally

Vote Signifies Policy Change

NEWS ANALYSIS

By Michael J. Barrett

Graduate students taking part in this week's referendum are doing more than casting a straw vote on the Vietnam war; the basic philosophy of the Graduate Student Association Council stands trial, and the Council's future direction hangs in the balance.

In its 14 years of existence, the Council has shied away from politics. The question now is whether the Council should commit itself, on behalf of the GSA members, on the war. Several of its members think so, and the issue has become the focus of much bitterness

Its leaders, including newly-elected President Paul Munyon, and past president Allen Parker, feel the Council shouldn't participate in political matters.

Aligned against them is Margaret Theeman and the Council's four-man social action committee, which she chairs. Miss Theeman wanted a referendum for all grad students.

She charges that Parker and the others have opposed her so that only the most conservative element of the graduate student population--those living in the graduate dorms and paying their dues to the GSA--would vote on the referendum.

Miss Theeman tried on February 5 to modify the referendum, which takes the relatively extreme position of requesting "immediate withdrawal," but was over-ruled.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags