News
Amid Boston Overdose Crisis, a Pair of Harvard Students Are Bringing Narcan to the Red Line
News
At First Cambridge City Council Election Forum, Candidates Clash Over Building Emissions
News
Harvard’s Updated Sustainability Plan Garners Optimistic Responses from Student Climate Activists
News
‘Sunroof’ Singer Nicky Youre Lights Up Harvard Yard at Crimson Jam
News
‘The Architect of the Whole Plan’: Harvard Law Graduate Ken Chesebro’s Path to Jan. 6
To the Editors of the CRIMSON:
With respect to Edward Gruson's letter re: Harvard vs. The Cambridge Free School, one thing puzzles me-he says, "... we asked the owner to permit the school to remain in the building..."-it seems to me that Harvard might have done something a good deal stronger than ask-why could they not have said, since they were buying the building, "we want this building to stand with the school using it until we can find a mutually satisfactory replacement." To hear Mr. Gruson, one might suppose that Harvard was helpless in the matter.
I'm afraid I do not find Mr. Gruson's statement altogether convincing. For several years now the Davises have worked very hard, for little or no salary, to found and operate the Free School. I do not believe that they would have let it close if there had seemed to them the slightest possibility of keeping it open, any more than I believe that if Harvard had been seriously interested in keeping it open, they could not have found some means of doing so.
In short, when an elephant steps on a mouse, it's hard for me to believe that it's the mouse's fault.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.