To the Editors of The Crimson:

To criticize the Harvard Corporation for its vote on the South African resolution at the General Electric stockholders meeting (April 17th editorial) while running a two-page advertisement for the South African-based De Beers Consolidated Mines on April 20th seems, at the very least, inconsistent. Does The Crimson have a double standard for "responsibility," or is this just another example of editorially hollow ethics? Sanford Climan '77