News

‘Deal with the Devil’: Harvard Medical School Faculty Grapple with Increased Industry Research Funding

News

As Dean Long’s Departure Looms, Harvard President Garber To Appoint Interim HGSE Dean

News

Harvard Students Rally in Solidarity with Pro-Palestine MIT Encampment Amid National Campus Turmoil

News

Attorneys Present Closing Arguments in Wrongful Death Trial Against CAMHS Employee

News

Harvard President Garber Declines To Rule Out Police Response To Campus Protests

Speaker Said to Conceal Father's Nazi History

By Noam S. Cohen

An expert on the history of the Holocaust this week challenged the selection of the president of West Germany as Commencement speaker saying the European statesman has systematically lied in defense of his father who was a chief diplomat for Nazi Germany.

In an article published in two area newspapers, Francis L. Loewenheim--a professor at Rice University--charged that while this year's Commencement speaker, Richard von Weiszacker, is an eloquent voice of the need for modern Germany to bear responsibility for Nazi war crimes, he has distorted his father's own role in those atrocities.

Loewenheim, the author of several books on Germany, said von Weizsacker assisted his father, Baron Ernst von Weizsacker, in authoring untruthful memoirs of the Baron's war years. The historian also said that the president--who served as his father's lawyer during the Nuremberg trials--claims to this day that his father was unaware of the existence of death camps in the face of what Loewenheim called overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

The elder von Weiszacker was charged by the international tribunal with assisting in the deportation of Jews to Nazi death camps and served 18 months in prison.

"To misrepresent the past is a very serious matter and morally reprehensible," said Loewenheim in an interview yesterday.

"A man so conspicuously lacking in candor and truthfulness...has no business gracing--or disgracing--Harvard University's 1987 Commencement as its principle speaker," the historian wrote yesterday in an opinion piece published in the the Boston Globe.

Harvard officials yesterday defended the choice of von Weiszacker, whose selection as the speaker for the 336th Commencement was announced in March.

The president of West Germany has been hailed by various Jewish groups--such as B'nai Brith's Anti-Defamation League and the World Jewish Congress--as a "unique" voice in modern Germany, because of his call to fellow Germans that they bear the responsibilities that derive from thecountry's Nazi past.

Von Weizsacker has been specially praised for a1985 speech he delivered on the 40th anniversaryof Germany's unconditional surrender. Many saidthe speech was an eloquent response to the moralproblems raised in Germany and the United Stateswhen President Reagan visited a Bitburg cemeterythat contained the graves of members of theS.S.--the Nazi elite guard.

"His courageous and magnificent speech standsas one of the great political and moral statementsof recent European history," Geyser UniversityProfessor Henry Rosovsky said at the time of theannouncement.

In an interview yesterday, Rosovsky, who isJewish, said Loewenheim's attack was "mostunfair." Rosovsky is a member of the HarvardCorporation that chooses the Commencement speaker.He said that it was wrong to hold the sonaccountable for the actions of his father.

"Perhaps, he has a blind spot about hisfather's [actions]," the former Dean of theFaculty said. But he added, "for a son to attemptto defend his father is an understandable act."Rosovsky also pointed out that von Weizsackerreceived an honorary degree from Tel AvivUniversity and had recently made a state visit toIsrael.

Rabbi Ben-Zion Gold of Harvard Hillel said hethought von Weiszacker was an excellent choice asCommencement speaker. He also attacked those whowere critical of the West German president. "It isparticularly disturbing because people have becomeguilt peddlers," Gold said.

Other members of the University said they weredisappointed in the choice of von Weiszacker.Professor of Law Alan Dershowitz said the Germanpresident was "a man who, more than most admitshis own guilt, yet denies his father'santi-Jewish, anti-Catholic past."

"He sees this honorary degree as a means ofvindicating his family name. I don't think Harvardshould be part of his vindicating his familyname," Dershowitz said.

Dershowitz was alluding to a 1985 New YorkTimes article which reported that some of thepresident's colleagues thought, "Weizsacker wasdetermined to become president of West Germany,and remains determined to become a greatpresident, in order to rehabilitate his familyname."

"It is not we who are blaming him, but he whois defending his family name," Dershowitz said,adding that the German president was not deservingof the honor of speaking at Commencement.

The noted civil rights lawyer said he had"received dozens of phone calls" from alumni who,in light of the Globe piece, were disturbed byHarvard's decision to name von Weizsacker as theCommencement speaker.

Loewenheim and other critics say that theproblem with choosing von Weizsacker is not hisown service in the German army during World WarII, where he rose to the rank of captain, but hisdefense of his father's actions as Germany's topprofessional diplomat.

Prosecutor for the allies during the Nurembergtrials charged the elder von Weizsacker withassisting in the deportation of 6000 French Jewsto the Nazi death camp Auschwitz. Loewenheim alsoclaims that the elder von Weizsacker's own filesshow that the foreign minister assisted in sendingPolish priests to Nazi concentration camps.

As his father's chief attorney, Richard vonWeizsacker presented a defense based on thepremise that his father was not aware of theexistence of the death camps. In an interview withthe Times he reiterated those feelings when hesaid, "I really believe that he did not know aboutthe existence of the gas chambers and systematicmass killing. I believe that he knew a lot ofpeople were dying, but not how."

"The important point is that in all thespeeches he has made, he has never admitted that[his father] was an integral part of the Naziregime," Loewenheim said in an interview. "He hasdissembled and lied about his father's role,"Loewenheim said.

If Harvard's Corporation had known this, Idoubt that this invitation would have beenextended," he said

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags