News

Cambridge Residents Slam Council Proposal to Delay Bike Lane Construction

News

‘Gender-Affirming Slay Fest’: Harvard College QSA Hosts Annual Queer Prom

News

‘Not Being Nerds’: Harvard Students Dance to Tinashe at Yardfest

News

Wrongful Death Trial Against CAMHS Employee Over 2015 Student Suicide To Begin Tuesday

News

Cornel West, Harvard Affiliates Call for University to Divest from ‘Israeli Apartheid’ at Rally

The Run Down on the Celtics' Offense

Mark My Words

By Mark Brazaitis

K.C. Jones may bear the name of a famous railroad engineer, but last year he acted more like a wise ship captain. When the Boston Celtic ship started to sink, Jones jumped overboard.

When Jones resigned last year as Celtic coach, he must have known the Celtics were in for a fall. But would even the most pessimistic of Celtic critics have predicted the team would be 8-8 and looking worse?

Today the Celtics travel to Chicago to face Michael Jordan, and the four players who pass him the ball. If the Celtics play at all like they did against Cleveland last Friday night--the final score was Cavaliers 112, Celtics 84--they will dip below .500 and find themselves in a struggle for fourth place in the Atlantic Division with the New Jersey Nets.

The Nets are improperly named. They should be called the New Jersey Backboards, because that's all they have hit recently.

Forward Larry Bird's injuries, which will keep him off the court for several months, have not helped the Celtics' cause. But Boston was struggling even with Bird in the line-up.

Last year the Celtics advanced to the finals of the Eastern Conference, where they fell to Detroit. Celtic management suggested the Celtics had two problems: a starting line-up made up of senior citizens and a weak bench.

Jimmy Rodgers, Jones' replacement, vowed to improve the Celtics, although he insisted on keeping the same crew. He would come in with new ideas about how the Celtics could win, he said.

Rodgers' ideas, as it turns out, revolve around an offense geared to the running game. The Celtics, formerly a team designed around a half-court offense, would have to run in order to succeed, Rodgers said.

Rodgers' decision to go with a running game is the equivalent of a poker player discarding a pair of aces in hopes of picking up a couple of 2s.

Rodgers is running his veterans, tiring them out and making it necessary to use his bench. Grind down Kevin McHale. Bring on Mark Acres. Wear out Dennis Johnson. Send in Reggie Lewis.

It's athletic suicide.

The Celtics problems are deeper than Rodgers' misguided ideas. No matter how you align them on the court or how fast you insist they play, the Celtics are still old. Their bench is still weak.

Last year they did all they could to reach the Eastern Conference finals. This year, a year older, a year more tired, they will be lucky to get the home court advantage for the first round of the playoffs.

The Beat Generation

The present Celtic cast is good enough to record a few more decent years, a few more playoff appearances. But it will never reach the NBA finals.

Celtic management needs to make a few moves to make the Celtics great again. The Celtic front office will not be able to do it strictly through the draft. The Celtics need to make a trade.

McHale is the most marketable Celtic player. Okay, he's in his early 30s, but big men have a longer NBA life expectancy. (Just look at Kareem Abdul Jabar.)

McHale could be traded to a weak team for a first-round draft choice. Center Robert Parrish might be used to acquire a top-notch draft choice, too, although it might be painful to part with such a solid center when there are few even mediocre centers around.

Bird is probably untouchable. But perhaps he would like to spend his final playing days (which are clearly numbered) in his home state of Indiana. The Pacers would not refuse such a request and would probably be more than willing to make it worth the Celtics' while.

Or how about a swap with the Los Angeles Lakers? Bird for Magic Johnson?

If Rodgers wants to run, Magic's his man.

Where is it written that the winner of the NFL's AFC West Division gets a free spot in the playoffs?

In the name of decent football, no team from that division should be allowed to participate in the postseason. The Los Angeles Raiders, Denver Broncos and company are giving mediocrity a bad name. These teams are positively bad.

Three teams are knotted at the top of the AFC West standings--Seattle, L.A. and Denver. All have 7-7 records.

Two more deserving teams which just happen to play in tougher divisions will be denied a spot in the playoffs because the AFC West winner gets a free spot.

If the playoffs were held today, Indianapolis (8-6) and New England (8-6) would be staying home.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags