Harvard is the one of the richest non-profit institutions on the planet. Second only to the Vatican, its endowment, which, after an energetic five-year Capital Campaign, recently exceeded $14 billion, far outweighs the financial resources of any other university in the world.
With this tremendous wealth comes a lot of opportunity--and a lot of power. Harvard can attract the best students, from every imaginable background, and admit them without regard to need or circumstance. It can entice the most promising and accomplished faculty with impressive salaries and a host of other benefits. It can maintain the nation's finest library system and still afford to keep its laboratories, dormitories, classrooms, and athletic and dining facilities in top condition. Taken together, these privileges--and make no mistake, they are privileges--allow Harvard to wield tremendous power.
But we know all this. Every glossy brochure from Admissions and Financial Aid, every issue of the Harvard Gazette, every press release from the Office of Government and Community Affairs supports the image that Harvard is a truly benevolent and worthy ruler, a force for good in the world.
Indeed, this weekend, the Harvard College Fund Assembly and the Harvard Alumni Association will host thousands of alumni in Cambridge for a series of committee meetings, faculty lectures, and fancy dinners to celebrate the very best in their alma mater--especially the $2.325 billion raised in the recent Capital Campaign. But even as this weekend's events symbolize Harvard's enormous wealth and power, a more disturbing relationship between wealth and poverty lurks beneath this seemingly pristine landscape of alumni satisfaction.
At this moment, there are at least 2,000 people working at Harvard who do not earn a living wage. Last spring, after much debate, the Cambridge City Council passed a $10 minimum wage provision so that city employees would have a better chance to live healthy, decent lives and raise their families in this community.
As it currently stands, Harvard routinely violates this basic standard. According to figures released from the administration in March 1999, 358 full-time and approximately 650 part-time or "casual" employees were paid less than $10 per hour for their work. Dining hall workers at Harvard Law School currently earn as little as six dollars per hour. Janitors are also among the lowest paid employees of the university, receiving $8.15 to $9.05 per hour. This amounts to $16,300 to $18,100 per year, which is hardly enough to support one person, never mind a family, living in Cambridge. Most of these men and women have to work two or three other jobs simply to put food on the table and pay their bills.
As if this were not enough, Harvard increasingly employs subcontracted labor, including guards from Security Systems Incorporated and janitors from UNICCO Service Company. These workers, many of whom were hired after union buyouts over the summer, do not have local union representation or access to health and other benefits. Without the guarantee of a $10 living wage, subcontracted laborers are among the lowest paid members of the university community. Although Harvard has not released figures, estimates suggest that subcontracted workers comprise the largest number of underpaid employees, perhaps as many as 1,000 people. The Living Wage Campaign--a coalition of students, workers, and faculty who are working to eliminate the problem of low-wage labor on campus--has demanded "that anyone who works at Harvard, whether directed employed or subcontracted to an outside company, must be paid a living wage of at least $10 per hour, adjustable for inflation." Not an end in itself, this is where any conversation about economic justice at Harvard should begin.
That Harvard does not currently pay its employees enough to live in the community where they work--where many, indeed, were born and raised--reveals its blatant disregard for the people of Cambridge. We would do well to remember that, given its status as a non-profit institution, Harvard is not required by law to pay taxes.
Living Wage Rally Draws Activist GroupsAfter two busy semesters of demonstrations and marches through the Yard, many may have expected the members of the Living
A Closer Look at Employment PoliciesPresident Rudenstine has asked me to meet on his behalf with students involved with the Living Wage Campaign. I had
The Numbers Tell a Grim StoryAdministrators, more than any other group of people I know, have the amazing ability to make anything sound boring. A
Report Calls for Dramatic Expansion of Worker Health Benefits, Job TrainingAfter 15 months of forceful student pressure, President Neil L. Rudenstine announced yesterday that the University plans to extend health
PSLM Argues Benefit Increases Are Not EnoughDespite winning major concessions from the University this week regarding worker benefits, organizers of the living wage campaign said yesterday
What the Committee ForgotLast Wednesday's labor recommendations proposed by the Harvard Ad-Hoc Committee on Employment Policies and President Neil L. Rudenstine's subsequent announcement