In a public hearing last night at City Hall, frustrated Cambridge residents tried to win one battle against the major new academic center by arguing that the proposed passageway—which would take two years to complete—would make construction significantly more disruptive.
The City Council will have to grant Harvard permission to dig the tunnel—a step that represents residents’ last chance to fight against CGIS, which has already received the go-ahead from other city agencies.
“All the neighbors I have met understand the reality of [CGIS],” said William C. Craig, a retired civil engineer who lives nearby the planned center. “[Harvard is] going to throw that project away just because of a tunnel? I can’t conceive it.”
Though he said he realizes CGIS is “guaranteed” to go forward with or without an underground connector, Craig plans to keep up the fight against the tunnel.
For nearly five years, the University and residents have locked horns over the design and location of the center, which will house Harvard’s government department and a dozen other research centers.
Though plans for the center itself have been settled, the tunnel remains a contentious issue standing in the way of Harvard’s most prominent building project in Cambridge. To build the tunnel numerous underground utilities would have to be rerouted. Cambridge Street would not be closed during construction, but temporary bridges would be erected across the street to carry traffic and pedestrians.
Last night’s public hearing at City Hall marked residents’ first chance to speak out against this plan. Many complained that the passage would block future utility lines and said the lengthy construction would disrupt the neighborhood without any benefit to residents.
“Having a safe and decent place to live is an entitlement,” said Nancy B. Young, who lives a block away from the proposed CGIS site on Cambridge Street. “Having a nice office is not an entitlement.”
Neighborhood leaders also said they worried that students would crowd the residential area, since plans for CGIS include several major classrooms.
Harvard officials insist the tunnel will improve safety on Cambridge Street by moving pedestrian traffic underground.
And the University will make “heroic efforts” to ensure construction does not disrupt the neighborhood, said Mary H. Power, Harvard’s senior director of community relations.
While neighborhood leaders asked why the University’s need for space couldn’t be satisfied by the well-publicized acreage in Allston, a Harvard official said that construction across the River would be five years too late.
“The need is now. The need was years ago,” said David A. Zewinski ’76, associate dean of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences for physical resources and planning.
Whether or not the city will grant Harvard permission to dig the tunnel remains unclear. The city’s planning board will need to approve an easement allowing the University to dig under the street. Later, the City Council will have to add its own seal of approval—which is likely to take well into 2002.
By voting down the tunnel the council would “discredit” and “alienate” the boards that have already approved the CGIS project, Zewinski said. And without the tunnel, CGIS planners would be forced to return to the drawing board.