According to a video of the class, Social Analysis 34, “Knowledge of Language,” Vaux began his lecture by saying, “Thank you for that, that was very nice. Now, appropriately enough after that, I have [a student] to comment on our Ebonics vocabulary.”
“The segue was very clear, and it caught everyone off guard,” said Kuumba President Johanna N. Paretzky ’03. “I don’t know if it was a lighthearted joke and he wanted people to laugh, but we didn’t.”
Vaux said in an interview yesterday he was not “equating Kuumba with Ebonics,” but said he wished the singers had made their guest performance at Monday’s lecture on Ebonics. A question had arisen in the prior class about grammar in the dialect and when Vaux asked if any of the students in the class were “native speakers of Ebonics,” no one volunteered.
“If they had come to the class before, I could have seized the opportunity to ask some of them if they were willing to answer some of these questions,” he said.
Vaux said he thought there might be a native Ebonics speaker in Kuumba who could answer the grammar question.
He acknowledged that “you can’t be sure based on someone’s race that they’ll speak a particular language.” But, he said, “the odds of someone who is African-American being familiar with Ebonics and having grammaticality judgments in it are greater than the odds of the student I had to use in class having them, who wasn’t African-American.”
According to Faculty of Arts and Sciences (FAS) spokesperson Robert Mitchell, FAS administrators were not aware of Vaux’s comments. But he said that if Kuumba’s account were accurate, “it’s a serious matter” and the administration would take appropriate action.
“I will pursue the issue with Dean [of the Faculty William C.] Kirby, and we would take the appropriate actions following a conversation with all of the relevant parties.” He would not elaborate on what those actions might be.
According to Paretzky, she and two other members of the group—Shelby J. Braxton-Brooks ’03 and Robert P. Young ’06—stayed after the lecture to express their concerns to Vaux and to ask that he apologize at the beginning of the next lecture on Monday.
Though she characterized the talk as “mature on all sides,” she said, “as much as he seemed to understand our complaint, he wasn’t explicitly apologetic at all. He said he didn’t realize we would take it that way.”
Paretzky added that she feels an apology is still warranted, though she said she understands Vaux did not set out to offend anyone.
“The segue was still really detrimental to the work a lot of members of Kuumba are trying to do in erasing misperceptions about what black culture and diversity are.”
Vaux said he is “happy to say something” and that he asked the Kuumba members to e-mail him what they would like him to say during the next class. He added the Kuumba members agreed, but that he had not received any correspondence from the group and could not contact them because he did not know who they were.
“If there are particular issues they want me to address I will be happy to. If they prefer for me to come up with something myself then I’ll do that instead,” Vaux said.
But Paretzky said Vaux’s response was inappropriate.