News

‘Deal with the Devil’: Harvard Medical School Faculty Grapple with Increased Industry Research Funding

News

As Dean Long’s Departure Looms, Harvard President Garber To Appoint Interim HGSE Dean

News

Harvard Students Rally in Solidarity with Pro-Palestine MIT Encampment Amid National Campus Turmoil

News

Attorneys Present Closing Arguments in Wrongful Death Trial Against CAMHS Employee

News

Harvard President Garber Declines To Rule Out Police Response To Campus Protests

Harper Has Activist Past

Howard U. grad and former NAACP lawyer has long sparred with Summers

By Zachary M. Seward, Crimson Staff Writer

Conrad K. Harper had an urgent letter to deliver last month, so naturally, he turned to FedEx. “Priority Overnight,” he recalls. “Gets it there on time.”

The letter, Harper’s adieu to the Harvard Corporation, awoke the University from summer’s lull and added an intriguing postscript to the drama of last semester. “I guess you can say it arrived,” he said in an interview this week.

Indeed, the letter arrived—on time—at Massachusetts Hall the following morning, setting off a flurry of commotion among Harper’s suddenly former colleagues on the board. In the two weeks before the resignation would be officially announced, James R. Houghton ’56 and Robert E. Rubin ’60 tried repeatedly to change Harper’s mind, an individual familiar with the board’s discussions said. But their attempts were to no avail.

Harper’s resignation took much of the Harvard community by surprise, but his friends and colleagues said the decision fit squarely with their impressions of the man—whom nearly all of them call “principled.”

“He just is one of those people who always would answer the call whenever the moment called for it,” says Climenko Professor of Law Charles J. Ogletree, who has known Harper for more than 30 years. “Whenever it takes sacrifice and commitment, Conrad is there.”

Ogletree had prepared a statement—along with Henry Louis Gates Jr., chair of the African and African American studies department—calling on University President Lawrence H. Summers to release Harper’s letter before the president did so himself on Monday.

Harper refused last week to release the letter himself, saying it was up to Summers and the Corporation. He would comment on his reasons for not releasing the letter himself beyond saying that it was up to Harvard to release it.

Harper and Summers first crossed paths not in Cambridge but in Washington, D.C., where they were both serving in rival departments in the Clinton administration. Harper was top legal adviser to the State Department from 1993 to 1996 while Summers was working his way up the Treasury department.

Several of Harper’s friends say he was less than satisfied with Summers’ position on affirmative action in higher education, although they declined to elaborate Harper’s concerns. The friends spoke on the condition of anonymity because Harper treasures his privacy, they say. Harper himself declined to comment on the matter.

A New York lawyer who has worked with Harper on several occasions suggested that he had been strongly influenced by one of his mentors, Cyrus R. Vance, who resigned as Secretary of State in 1980 after President Carter ordered a hostage rescue mission in Iran over Vance’s objections.

“That incident must have had a profound effect on Conrad when he was still at the beginning of his legal career,” the lawyer said.

Harper’s resignation from the Corporation isn’t the first time he publicly protested his voice not being heard. As president of the New York City Bar Association in 1991, Harper published a piece in The Washington Post criticizing the first Bush administration for excluding his group from evaluations of judicial nominees.

“It is time for the Justice Department to live up to its name by renouncing the tactics of the bully and the methods of the tyrant,” Harper wrote. In an interview this week, he recalled that time as challenging. “We were very much at loggerheads with the Justice Department,” he said.

Harper, 64, argued his first case before the U.S. Supreme Court just four years out of Harvard Law School as an attorney for the NAACP Legal Defense Fund in 1969. The case, Daniel v. Paul, pitted African-American residents of Little Rock, Ark., against an all-white club that had denied them membership.

Harper won the case for the Little Rock residents. He also successfully negotiated the desegregation of the Chicago public schools in 1977, solidifying his status as a preeminent civil rights lawyer.

Harper was the first and only African American to serve on the Corporation in Harvard’s 369-year history. That’s a designation with which he is intimately familiar, having also been the first black partner at Simpson Thacher and Bartlett, the prestigious New York law firm, and the first black president of the New York City Bar Association.

Now, in semi-retirement, he serves as an infrequent adviser to the firm. A resident of Manhattan, he spoke this week from Cape Cod, where he was vacationing with his wife.

Though both of his parents were graduates of schools in Atlanta, Harper said they felt the city was still too segregated for a black student at the time.

“They thought it would be better for me to be in an environment where there were many able African Americans,” Harper recalled.

A classic intellectual who sometimes speaks in antiquated constructions—“I shall not comment,” he says repeatedly—Harper is an avid reader and active member of the Jane Austen Society of North America.

“Austen’s capacity to see insightfully into character is peerless,” said Harper, who questioned Summers’ own character in his resignation letter.

In his letter to Summers, Harper called his time on the Corporation “a highlight of my working life.” But in an interview, he would not say why that was so.

“I think I’ll leave that one alone,” he said.

—Staff writer Zachary M. Seward can be reached at seward@fas.harvard.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags