News
‘Deal with the Devil’: Harvard Medical School Faculty Grapple with Increased Industry Research Funding
News
As Dean Long’s Departure Looms, Harvard President Garber To Appoint Interim HGSE Dean
News
Harvard Students Rally in Solidarity with Pro-Palestine MIT Encampment Amid National Campus Turmoil
News
Attorneys Present Closing Arguments in Wrongful Death Trial Against CAMHS Employee
News
Harvard President Garber Declines To Rule Out Police Response To Campus Protests
To the editors:
Re: “Faculty Approves Secondary Fields,” news, Apr. 5.
I was genuinely surprised to see the faculty approve secondary fields for Harvard undergraduates. Secondary fields strike at the underlying premise of Harvard students’ education: that they should be students of the world and not of select disciplines.
A discipline is a perspective. It is meant to be a tool or lens, with which we decipher and study the world around us—it is not to be studied exclusively in itself. No wonder, Harvard’s long-time insistence on joint concentrations disallowed the pursuit of two fields in separation. What is important is not the fields in themselves but the perspective we gain from them (with multidisciplinary exposure simply meaning broader perspective), and so, under the old structure, joint concentrators were forced to make connections between their interests.
Now, by shifting the emphasis from gaining perspective to gaining compartmentalized sets of knowledge, secondary fields will narrow a student’s intellect, not broaden it.
SARITHA KOMATIREDDY ’05
Washington, D.C.
April 6, 2006
The writer was a Crimson editorial editor.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.