All of these uses enforce the admirable nature of the University’s efforts to utilize its resources for the public good.
Harvard should be a transformational place, and if this lawsuit succeeds, it will fail to achieve one fundamental part of that mission.
The trend largely stems from the misperception, both on this campus and on others across the country, that the skills learned in the humanities are not professionally marketable.
Solitary confinement is a barbaric practice, unacceptable as a routine punishment.
As a campus—students, administrators, and professors—we must strive to leave Harvard more inclusive than we found it.
Ideally, government agencies would have access to encrypted content if it posed a threat to public safety. But allowing the government privileged access to digital devices would make the public more vulnerable by weakening the security mechanisms currently in place.
These costs will only continue to rise as the renovations progress; the next superintendent must ensure that they do not rise too high.
If Harvard administrators are so afraid of the idea of unionization in the context of how it would affect the University’s academic ideals and institutions, then that should be reason enough for change.
The fact that we even have to confront such a question is indicative of the magnitude of the gun problem in this country.
The launch of the HTF program is a hopeful step, evidence that Harvard is thinking hard about how to provide infrastructure for career paths other than those Harvard has traditionally thrown support behind.
The continued growth of the fantasy sports industry is proving the federal exception outdated.
These quibbles may seem small, but they are not. On something as consequential as sexual assault policy, the University must make sure that its policies are as fair and coherent as possible.
We hope that other networks took notes and will focus on creating more civil, substantive Republican debates in the future.
With its potential to exacerbate serious public health issues and its limited financial benefits, the plan to lift the alcohol ban is ill conceived.