News
Amid Boston Overdose Crisis, a Pair of Harvard Students Are Bringing Narcan to the Red Line
News
At First Cambridge City Council Election Forum, Candidates Clash Over Building Emissions
News
Harvard’s Updated Sustainability Plan Garners Optimistic Responses from Student Climate Activists
News
‘Sunroof’ Singer Nicky Youre Lights Up Harvard Yard at Crimson Jam
News
‘The Architect of the Whole Plan’: Harvard Law Graduate Ken Chesebro’s Path to Jan. 6
Question: Resolved, That the Interstate Commerce Act should be so amended as to allow pooling.
Brief for the Affirmative.
F. W. MOORE and F. L. YOUNG.
Best general references: Quarterly Jour. of Econ. II, 184-185 (Jan. 1888) and IV. 158-171 (Jan. 1890); Pol. Science Quarterly II. 369 (Sept. 1887); Report of Inter state Commerce Commission I. 307-312 (Dec. 1,1887), II, 436 et seq. (Dec. 1,1888), III, 394 et seq. (Nov. 30, 1889), IV. 351-358 (Nov. 29, 1890); Report of Senate Comm. on Interstate commerce in Senate Reports (No. 46) 1st Session 49th Congress (1885-86) III, Part 2, 71-77, 114-117, 119-120, 123-126, 170-173, 194. 202, 203, 1206.
I. The prohibition of pooling was the result of popular misapprehension; Quar. Jour. Econ. II. 164.
II. The prohibition leads to-(a) Ruinous competition by causing-(1) Rate wars: Quar. Jour. Econ. III. 182-3,-(2) The construction of unnecessary parallel lines: Ibid.-(b) Consolidation and absence of competition.
III. Prohibition disturbs business-(a) Instability of rates: Quar. Jour. Econ. IV. 159-160.-(b) Discriminations.
IV. Pooling insures competition, advantageous-(a) To the public.-(b) To the railroads.
V. A pool regulated by law and controlled by a commission is the best-solution of the railway problem.-(a) Most economists and railroad experts support this view.
Brief for the Negative.
R. W. HUNTER and F. C. THWAITS.
Best general references: J. F. Hudson, The Railways and the Republic 194-250; International Commerce Rep't, 1879, p. 167; Interstate Commerce Rep't 1886, pp. 360, 880, 1204 etc.
I. There is no necessity for pooling.-(a) Serious rate wars have ceased since passage of Interstate Commerce Law-(b) The discriminations which pooling is supposed to prevent are prohibition by the I. S. Com. Law.-(c) There are other ways of avoiding excessive competition: Forum XIII 745 (Aug. 1892)-Western Traffic Association.
II. Pooling is an evil.- (a) It deteriorates the service: J. F. Hudson, 229.-(b) It puts arbitrary power over the commerce of the country into the hands of a few men: Hadley's Railroad Trans. p. 76: Hon. T. M. Cooley in Boston Transcript, Jan. 9,1889.-(c) Its object is to raise rates by destroying competition: Hudson p. 215: Mr. Lincoln in Interstate Commerce Rep't 1886, p. 363.-(d) It destroys healthful competition.-(e) It leads to the maintenance of unnecessary roads at the expense of the public: Hudson 230, 418.
III. Pooling under control of a government commission would not be practicable-(a) Because of the great number of Rail-roads: Poor's R. R. Manual for 1892.-(b) No commission would be competent to judge on the merits of the question of pooling.-(c) It would put two much power in hands of the commission.- (d) Such a plan was defeated in the House: Cong. Record 1893, pp. 709-715; Minority Rep't against pooling in Cong. Record 1893 p. 712.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.