News
Amid Boston Overdose Crisis, a Pair of Harvard Students Are Bringing Narcan to the Red Line
News
At First Cambridge City Council Election Forum, Candidates Clash Over Building Emissions
News
Harvard’s Updated Sustainability Plan Garners Optimistic Responses from Student Climate Activists
News
‘Sunroof’ Singer Nicky Youre Lights Up Harvard Yard at Crimson Jam
News
‘The Architect of the Whole Plan’: Harvard Law Graduate Ken Chesebro’s Path to Jan. 6
The Bok peace Plan found only two supporters when the vote was taken after the meeting of the Freshman Discussion Club last night. The resolution, "That the United States should unconditionally act in accord with the provisions of the Bok Peace Plan," was ably defended by F. V. M. Montanari and M. J. Dononvan, but fell before the attack of J. R. Creel and W. E. Wilson, who argued that "The Bok Plan is an impracticable, half-baked compromise between the League of Nations and nothing at all."
Speakers for the negative demonstrated that the many previous peace plans, notably the Hague Tribunal, which resemble the Bok Plan, have all failed; and that the grounds on which the United States Senate originally objected to the League have been removed by changes in the League constitution. The affirmative admitted that the League is the ideal, but advocates the Plan as a means of attaining the ideal, which the misinformed people refuse to attain at a jump.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.