News

Erica Chenoweth and Zoe Marks Named Pfoho Faculty Deans

News

Harvard SEAS Faculty Reflect on Outgoing Dean, Say Successor Should Be Top Scholar

News

South Korean President Yoon Talks Nuclear Threats From North Korea at Harvard IOP Forum

News

Harvard University Police Advisory Board Appoints Undergrad Rep After Yearlong Vacancy

News

After Meeting with Harvard Admin on ‘Swatting’ Attack, Black Student Leaders Say Demands Remain Unanswered

THE REVIEWER REVIEWED

NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED

The sham of forced writing is exposed in the "New Republic" of this week by a paid member of the critical fraternity. This shameless reviewer makes the wide retreat of anonymity his confessional. From that untouchable haven, the exposes the method of putting a perfunctory bits into uninspired comment.

Such an admission must delight many authors outraged by a cacophonous conjunction of insult bearing words. Perhaps it will take the sting from an evil-flavored review to know that the critic did not believe his published opinion. In order to hold his job, the reviewer must grind out comment which will command attention. And obviously the easiest method of inspiring interest is the satirical. All mankind from the village gossip to the astute politician is quite willing to hear evil of its neighbor, be he friend or foe.

Nor can the critic always be blamed for his shrewishness. Even though one grant him a disposition superior to chronic mud slinging, his provocation is immense. Before rattling off the presses, most novels have endured compression to standard dimensions of theme and plot. More than human patience would be required for the reviewer to pick out minor originalities from this stereotyped mass. After all, acidity is the best antidote for dullness.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags