News

Cambridge Residents Slam Council Proposal to Delay Bike Lane Construction

News

‘Gender-Affirming Slay Fest’: Harvard College QSA Hosts Annual Queer Prom

News

‘Not Being Nerds’: Harvard Students Dance to Tinashe at Yardfest

News

Wrongful Death Trial Against CAMHS Employee Over 2015 Student Suicide To Begin Tuesday

News

Cornel West, Harvard Affiliates Call for University to Divest from ‘Israeli Apartheid’ at Rally

Professor Discounts Likelihood of Gov't Forcing Arbitration

NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED

Elliot J. Berg, assistant professor of Economics, said yesterday that he is highly skeptical whether federal legislators will ever force compulsory arbitration on labor and management.

Berg spoke lightly of a testimony before the House Merchant Marine Committee Wednesday that compulsory arbitration for maritime disputes "would be a great incentive for more effective collective bargaining." Solon B. Turman, chairman of Lykes Brothers Steamship Company Inc., giving the testimony, said that a threat of binding arbitration would induce labor and management to settle their disputes themselves.

These suggestions, Berg said, are contradicted by past experience. He said that in the past, when labor and management have been faced with a threat of compulsory arbitration, both sides have often preferred to let their problems be arbitrated instead of negotiating them themselves.

Berg further contended that "compulsory arbitration has never settled an issue."

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags