News
Amid Boston Overdose Crisis, a Pair of Harvard Students Are Bringing Narcan to the Red Line
News
At First Cambridge City Council Election Forum, Candidates Clash Over Building Emissions
News
Harvard’s Updated Sustainability Plan Garners Optimistic Responses from Student Climate Activists
News
‘Sunroof’ Singer Nicky Youre Lights Up Harvard Yard at Crimson Jam
News
‘The Architect of the Whole Plan’: Harvard Law Graduate Ken Chesebro’s Path to Jan. 6
The Business School's MBA Faculty sent back to committee last Friday a radical grading-reform proposal which would have reduced the number of grading categories from the present 15 to only three.
Under the proposed system, the top sixth of each class would be placed in Category I, the middle two-thirds in Category II, and the bottom sixth in Category III. The Academic Performance Committee would review a student's record if he placed in Category III for more than half of his courses.
The grading-reform idea was drafted during the summer by the Business School's most powerful committee, the Policy and Operating Committee (POC). The proposal is once again on the POC's desk and will probably resurface next Spring.
Charles J. Christenson, chairman of the POC, defended the proposed grading reform. He said a grading system should be used only to decide who gets a degree, and not for the purposes of feedback and motivation.
Bruce Fowler, chairman of the Student Association's education committee, favored the delay. "There were an awful lot of students who thought this thing was being railroaded through." Fowler, a second-year MBA student, said that students objected to "the whole thing being on a curve and having a quota for each category. A lot of people felt that Group III condemns one-sixth of the class to bad grades.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.