News

Cambridge Residents Slam Council Proposal to Delay Bike Lane Construction

News

‘Gender-Affirming Slay Fest’: Harvard College QSA Hosts Annual Queer Prom

News

‘Not Being Nerds’: Harvard Students Dance to Tinashe at Yardfest

News

Wrongful Death Trial Against CAMHS Employee Over 2015 Student Suicide To Begin Tuesday

News

Cornel West, Harvard Affiliates Call for University to Divest from ‘Israeli Apartheid’ at Rally

Finding Out That Goldfish Are Now Sharks

(This is the first article in a three-part series dealing with the state of the Harvard swimming program)

By Raymond A. Urban

When it comes time for the Harvard Sports News Bureau to put out next year's "Swimming Media Information Guide" the printers are going to be busy changing type. Eleven of the 16 University swimming records fell in the Easterns down at Yale last weekend. Of the nine individual records set, eight of them were set by freshmen Rich Baughman. Tim Neville, and Dave Brumwell.

And the week before, also at Yale, I heard a man behind me in the stands comment on Rich Baughman's breaking of former Olympian John Nelson's Yale pool record. "Shoot, you think that's good? Just wait till next year. Baughman is going to have to fight to stay on the team." His wife laughed.

"As far as I'm concerned, the most important day of the season is admissions day at Harvard."--Head Swim Coach Don Gambril.

There was a time not so long ago that American swimming was instantly associated with one man and one institution. The man's name was Robert J.H. Kiphuth and the institution was Yale. Kiphuth was head swimming coach at Yale from 1918-1959, during that time span he amassed a dual meet record of 528-12, a record unsurpassed in the history of sport.

No one, not even Harvard, conceived of beating Yale during Kiphuth's reign. During these same years Harvard finished a consistent and happy number two in Ivy swimming.

The 1960's brought a new coach to Yale. Kiphuth's former assistant. Phil Moriarty, the establishment of the Eastern Swimming Championships in 1962. Harvard's highest finish ever in the NCAA's (4th in 1961), and a Harvard victory over Yale. That Harvard-Yale meet of 1962 generated enough enthusiasm to pack the IAB and warrant a closed circuit TV broadcast to Sanders Theater.

Last year the Harvard swim team went 5-5, 2-5 in the Eastern League, and experienced its first losing record in League history, losing to Penn. Princeton, Dartmouth, Army, and Yale. The consistent and happy number two Harvard finish had turned into a fight to have a winning season. Harvard was caught being the leisurely country gentleman in a city full of sophisticated hustlers.

Throughout Bill Brooks reign as head coach, the Harvard swimming program had proceeded in much the same way. Harvard's name, its alumni, and its admission emphasis on the well-rounded good guy resulted each year in a large number of fair to excellent athletes being admitted in all sports.

Swimming was by no means an exception, with such swimmers as former 1500 meter world record holder Steve Krause '71, nationally ranked backstroker Dan Kobick '72, and Henry Watson '73, ranked fourth in the world in the 1500 meter freestyle while in high school.

The athletic and swimming administration at Harvard took no particular interest in potential swimmers before they sent in their applications. Other schools might be writing regularly, offering scholarships, sending an assistant coach to talk to the swimmer, and paying for campus visits but at Harvard the only direct pre-admission pressure came from zealous alumni.

A swimmer who chose to come to Harvard never did so primarily because of the swimming program here. For a number of the swimmers the switch to Harvard's program resulted in a big drop from intensive, big-time high school and AAU programs.

A case in example is Tim Chetin '73, who came to Harvard from Palo Alto High School and George Haines' Santa Clara Swim Club. Both the high school and the swim club were among the best in the nation while Tim swam for them and George Haines is internationally known for his teams, his Olympic coaching, and his world record holders. Swimming at Palo Alto and Santa Clara was an 11 month, 6 or 7 days of the week, twice a day, 8,000 to 12,000 yards a day routine.

A swimmer entering the freshman program at Harvard knew that no one expected him to work that hard and soon found out that there were a 100 better things to do than go an extra 4,000 to 8,000 yards. With almost no exception, swimmers began scheduling swimming into their lives rather than their lives around swimming.

The freshman team provided an ideal transition point in the de-emphasisation of the importance of swimming while providing the opportunity to work out, try out intercollegiate swimming, get to know one's classmates, and have a good time. Every single swimmer that swam on a freshman team, the old coaches, and the Harvard athletic administration state that a required freshman program is a good idea.

It allowed swimmers of a wide range of ability to give collegiate swimming a go; Lon McCroskey '73, expressed typical sentiments about his freshman team, one of the best Harvard has had in the last decade. "I was disappointed with myself in that I never did hit my top high school times. But the workouts were easy. I stayed in shape, and even though I played only a minor role on the team. I liked it. I guess it took freshman year to find out that my swimming days were over."

McCroskey's experience points to two crucial areas that are essential to an understanding of the current evolution of Harvard swimming, the demise of the freshman swimming program and the role personal pride and performance plays in keeping a swimmer swimming competitively.

In 1970 the NCAA decided that the decision on whether or not a freshman athlete would be allowed to compete on a varsity level in individual sports such as swimming and track would be left to each individual school or conference. The reasons for the decision were purely economic on two levels.

In most of the larger universities each team is allotted a certain number of athletic scholarships and other incentives. The number might be 16. Because you have to continue the scholarship for four years this would provide you with four scholarships for freshmen, each of whom would contribute three years of varsity swimming to enhance the team's record, prestige, and alumni support.

But without a restriction prohibiting freshmen from varsity competition the same amount of money would provide 16 varsity swimmers rather than the previous 12, or sticking with the 12 the university could save money. The more swimmers a program could recruit, the better the program and hence an increase in interest and money it would receive from alumni, athletic administration, and spectators.

The decision to allow freshman participation was a step in the formal recognition of an athlete who is paid to come to a given university to perform.

The Ivy League sports philosophy of the opportunity of intercollegiate competition for everyone was in theory dedicated to the maintenance of freshman athletics. Had the Ivy coaches and athletic directors along with Army and Navy (the other swimming members of the Eastern league) decided that freshman competition in individual sports was worth keeping, it would still be with us.

But the results show that the Ivy schools are as greedy for the big-time publicity, prestige, and money as the schools of other athletic conferences.

During the late 1960's, Yale, formerly the class of the world, began to slip in its national rank while such schools as Indiana. Texas, and Long Beach State were developing into swimming powerhouses. Where formerly the top national swimmers would apply to Yale8Scoring: Relays 7--0 All Other Events 5--3--1

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags