News
Amid Boston Overdose Crisis, a Pair of Harvard Students Are Bringing Narcan to the Red Line
News
At First Cambridge City Council Election Forum, Candidates Clash Over Building Emissions
News
Harvard’s Updated Sustainability Plan Garners Optimistic Responses from Student Climate Activists
News
‘Sunroof’ Singer Nicky Youre Lights Up Harvard Yard at Crimson Jam
News
‘The Architect of the Whole Plan’: Harvard Law Graduate Ken Chesebro’s Path to Jan. 6
Increased reliance on nuclear power is "unpalatable" because the benign attitudes of nuclear power proponents toward the development of new nuclear plants are false and unrealistic, MIT physicist Henry W. Kendall said yesterday.
Kendall's views clash with those of Michael Driscoll, another MIT physics professor, who said yesterday that nuclear power presents less risks than more common sources of power, like coal.
Nuclear power wins "hands down" over coal power, Driscoll said, adding that the tremendous amount of previous research into the effects of nuclear radiation means the technological problems of nuclear power "can be licked."
Driscoll said it is unlikely that individuals will be able to steal radioactive material from nuclear plants in order to build their own atomic bombs, but did warn of the possibility that as more and more nations develop atomic weapons one of them will use a nuclear bomb.
Kendall said he is worried that nuclear plants could release massive amounts of radiation into the atmosphere after an accident during a plant's operation.
"A ruptured pipe or a poorly designed pressure vessel" could cause the release over an area of 60 to 70 miles ten times the radiation that an American atomic bomb caused in Hiroshima, Japan, in 1945, Kendall said.
"Badly managed plants, high accident records and poor plant performance mean that nuclear power proposals are impertinent and unwise," he said.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.