News
Amid Boston Overdose Crisis, a Pair of Harvard Students Are Bringing Narcan to the Red Line
News
At First Cambridge City Council Election Forum, Candidates Clash Over Building Emissions
News
Harvard’s Updated Sustainability Plan Garners Optimistic Responses from Student Climate Activists
News
‘Sunroof’ Singer Nicky Youre Lights Up Harvard Yard at Crimson Jam
News
‘The Architect of the Whole Plan’: Harvard Law Graduate Ken Chesebro’s Path to Jan. 6
Two Harvard students convinced a heckling audience of debaters and a skeptical panel of judges last weekend that there is a monster among us, and in so doing won the national parliamentary debate tournament.
Douglas F. Curtis '84 and Neil H. Buchanan, a second-year graduate student in economics, defeated a team from Amherst in the tournament's final round Saturday at the University of Chicago to clinch the victory.
Ronster?
Given the topic--"The monster is among us"--Curtis and Buchanan took a very liberal interpretation in the tradition of off-topic debate, and defined the resolution to mean that Ronald Reagan's presidency has been harmful.
Harvard also claimed a near monopoly on the top speaker awards which are awarded for individual performance in the six preliminary ranks as well as the final. Harvard debaters took four of the top five speaker awards, with Curtis getting first and Buchanan getting fourth.
Attention
Christian F. Cooper '84 and William H. Smith '85, placing fifth as a team, won fifth and third speaker awards respectively.
Harvard's victory capped off the third year of the Harvard Speech and Parliamentary Debate Society's existence. Last year a Harvard team reached the final round of nationals but was edged out in a close decision by Princeton.
Anthony J. DiNovi '84, president of HSPDS, called Harvard's performance "just unbelievable." He added that it was, "even more fantastic when you consider that two years ago we didn't even have a team."
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.