News

Cambridge Residents Slam Council Proposal to Delay Bike Lane Construction

News

‘Gender-Affirming Slay Fest’: Harvard College QSA Hosts Annual Queer Prom

News

‘Not Being Nerds’: Harvard Students Dance to Tinashe at Yardfest

News

Wrongful Death Trial Against CAMHS Employee Over 2015 Student Suicide To Begin Tuesday

News

Cornel West, Harvard Affiliates Call for University to Divest from ‘Israeli Apartheid’ at Rally

A Watershed Year in Cambridge Politics

Election Preview

By Martha A. Bridegam

Cambridge politics will never be the same again.

For the first time in at least 20 years, three incumbent City Councillors are not seeking re-election. That by itself guarantees a shakeup, especially by comparison with 1987, when all nine councillors won re-election.

David E. Sullivan, the most outspoken proponent of rent control, announced his withdrawal from the 1989 council race this fall, citing a need to spend time with his family. And Saundra M. Graham, a fellow rent control supporter, says she is retiring from elected office to work with the League of Afro-American Women, a local minority entrepreneurship organization.

But the move that has rocked city politics most strongly is Mayor Alfred E. Vellucci's sudden decision to retire from the council and run for School Committee.

Swing Vote

Vellucci has spent most of his 34 years on the council providing the key swing vote for liberal programs such as rent control, while representing a conservative East Cambridge constituency.

For at least the past decade, the Council has been divided between four conservative Independents, with their commitment to neighborhood and business concerns, and four liberal Cambridge Civic Association (CCA) members, who favor rent control and limits on development.

Vellucci, however, has moved back and forth between the two camps, keeping the council as close to deadlocked as a nine-member body can be.

Members of all factions agree that Vellucci's absence means the November municipal election will produce a clear majority for one of the city's political coalitions for the first time since 1971.

While the six remaining incumbents appear secure, nobody wants to predict who will occupy the other three seats, or which political faction will gain the upper hand.

With Cambridge's at-large proportional representation system, the only sure things seem to be that another outspoken liberal will replace Sullivan and that an East Cambridge native--of uncertain political orientation--will replace Vellucci.

The smart money may be on the Independents, chiefly because no other candidate with Vellucci's liberal views seems capable of wooing his generally conservative East Cambridge constituents.

"I don't think there's any way the CCA can capture the hearts of the people of East Cambridge," says Independent Councillor William H. Walsh.

But Graham and Sullivan predict that the city's "progressives" might feel sufficiently threatened to get out the vote in unprecedented numbers and secure a fifth seat. Graham adds that the usual turnout for city council elections is around 35 percent of the electorate. In this election, she says creating a sense of urgency to get out the vote may be the most important task for either side.

If the CCA wins five seats--as it last did in 1971--it will most likely use its clear majority to enact stricter curbs on developers. It could also refuse to renew the contract of City Manager Robert W. Healy, an Independent ally, and it might investigate Independent-dominated city departments such as Inspectional Services.

If the Independents secured a fifth pro-business, conservative seat on the Council, they would almost certainly weaken or abolish the rent control law and would probably cut zoning restrictions to encourage development. They would also most likely keep Healy in office.

1-2-3 Adds Interest

Adding further excitement to the 1989 race is the presence on the ballot of Proposition 1-2-3, a binding referendum whose chief provision would let rent-control tenants buy their units as condominiums after living there two years or more.

Sullivan said he would devote much of his spare time this fall to fighting the measure, which he considers one of the gravest threats ever to rent control.

The measure's supporters, who have so far received generous contributions from the city real estate industry, may bring out a strong anti-rent control vote that could sweep in a fifth Independent. But on the other hand, the threat to rent control may bring out more votes from those who benefit from the system.

Graham's Successor

Meanwhile, Graham, the only Black city councillor, says her bloc of voters will probably keep "a Black seat" on the next council--but adds, "it could be a more moderate Black seat."

Possible successors, she said, include Alan Bell, a polling and management consultant from North Cambridge. Reached last night, Bell said he filed his candidacy papers last week, making him one of the first official contenders.

He described himself as "more moderate" than Graham. He also said he would favor Proposition 1-2-3, but only with safeguards that would protect minority and low-income citizens from "being squeezed out" by rent-control landlords interested in prospective condominium buyers.

Bell said he got on well politically with Graham, but added, "my reach is different from hers." He noted that his political ties in the city include a variety of civic board memberships, the vice-presidency of the Chamber of Commerce and his company's business relationship with the Community Development and School Departments.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags