News
Summers Will Not Finish Semester of Teaching as Harvard Investigates Epstein Ties
News
Harvard College Students Report Favoring Divestment from Israel in HUA Survey
News
‘He Should Resign’: Harvard Undergrads Take Hard Line Against Summers Over Epstein Scandal
News
Harvard To Launch New Investigation Into Epstein’s Ties to Summers, Other University Affiliates
News
Harvard Students To Vote on Divestment From Israel in Inaugural HUA Election Survey
Proposition 1-2-3, a binding referendum that will appear on city ballots in next November's election, has proved one of the most divisive issues in Cambridge politics this year.
Supporters of the measure claim it will allow thousands of city residents to buy their own homes, while opponents claim the measure could devastate the city's 19-year old rent-control ordinance.
The referendum is divided into three parts:
Proposition 1 would allow tenants who have lived in rent-controlled apartments for more than two years to buy them, if the landlord is willing to sell.
Proposition 2 would exempt from rent control single-family homes and condominiums which have been lived in by their owners for more than two years.
Proposition 3 would set aside two-thirds of the tax revenues raised by the sale of rent-controlled apartments and place it in a special fund to support affordable housing.
As part of an ongoing Commentary feature, The Crimson solicited editorial pieces from city residents supporting and opposing 1-2-3.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.