News
Amid Boston Overdose Crisis, a Pair of Harvard Students Are Bringing Narcan to the Red Line
News
At First Cambridge City Council Election Forum, Candidates Clash Over Building Emissions
News
Harvard’s Updated Sustainability Plan Garners Optimistic Responses from Student Climate Activists
News
‘Sunroof’ Singer Nicky Youre Lights Up Harvard Yard at Crimson Jam
News
‘The Architect of the Whole Plan’: Harvard Law Graduate Ken Chesebro’s Path to Jan. 6
Stanford University was rocked by controversy earlier this year over that most basic of academic issues: what speech should always remain protected and what is so offensive that it can be stopped. After a sit-in on the president's office and various disciplinary penalties, the issue has yet to be resolved.
In an effort to avoid a replay of the recent Stanford controversy, Harvard's Faculty of Arts and Sciences (FAS) this year will debate a set of regulations designed to spell out the boundaries of free speech on campus.
The proposed rules, prompted by a series of disrupted campus speeches, have been under review by the general counsel's office and should be voted on by the faculty this fall.
A faculty committee, headed by Dillon Professor of International Security Joseph S. Nye, produced the guidelines, acting largely along the lines of rules drafted in an Undergraduate Council report on free speech.
Ranging from a prohibition on hanging banners with racial epithets in the Yard to specifications for canceling a speaking event, the proposed guidelines are more than likely to prompt a controversy of their own.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.