News

‘Deal with the Devil’: Harvard Medical School Faculty Grapple with Increased Industry Research Funding

News

As Dean Long’s Departure Looms, Harvard President Garber To Appoint Interim HGSE Dean

News

Harvard Students Rally in Solidarity with Pro-Palestine MIT Encampment Amid National Campus Turmoil

News

Attorneys Present Closing Arguments in Wrongful Death Trial Against CAMHS Employee

News

Harvard President Garber Declines To Rule Out Police Response To Campus Protests

KSG Dean Argues For Affirmative Action

April 1 court hearing nears

Professor of Law CHRISTOPHER F. Edley Jr. 78 presented his views on affirmative action last night at the Kennedy School of  Government.
Professor of Law CHRISTOPHER F. Edley Jr. 78 presented his views on affirmative action last night at the Kennedy School of Government.
By Hera A. Abbasi, CONTRIBUTING WRITER

More than 150 people packed a Kennedy School of Government (KSG) auditorium last night in a show of support for affirmative action in education, which is threatened by an impending Supreme Court case.

KSG Dean Joseph S. Nye gave a strong endorsement of affirmative action, and Professor of Law Christopher F. Edley Jr. ’78 presented the Constitutional case for maintaining it during the hour-long program.

Students packed Wiener Auditorium to capacity yesterday for the event, which was organized by KSG students Wayne H. Ho and Akiba E. Smith-Francis ’00.

Edley, a founding co-director of the Civil Rights Project at Harvard, argued that affirmative action is not to remedy past wrongs.

Instead, he said, diversity improves the educational experience of students, a claim that parallels Harvard’s central argument in favor of using race as a factor in admissions.

Organizers said the event’s goal was to raise awareness about affirmative action leading up to a rally in Washington April 1, the day of a pivotal Supreme Court hearing.

As of last night, nearly 60 KSG students planned to attend the rally, according to Ho.

Nye said that affirmative action “matters tremendously to our university and our school. There is an enormous amount that students at the Kennedy School learn from diversity.”

Edley noted that there is widespread confusion about affirmative action. To clarify, he defined it as “the use of race, ethnicity, gender, disability status, whatever the characteristic, as a factor in the decision making about people and resources.”

Edley also discussed one of the two affirmative action cases in front of the nation’s highest court—Grutter v. Bollinger.

The cases challenge the use of race in the admissions policy of the University of Michigan Law School.

Edley said that a major issue in the Grutter case is whether diversity can be a compelling interest that can be permitted under equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment.

Edley criticized the Bush Administration’s position on the case.

“The administration attacks the Michigan program for being a quota. I think the technical term for that is a lie,” he said.

Edley said that people have a tendency to favor others who are like them, and that affirmative action works against this tendency.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags