Residents Demand Answers at Council Meeting on Police Killing of Sayed Faisal
Bob Odenkirk Named Hasty Pudding Man of the Year
Harvard Kennedy School Dean Reverses Course, Will Name Ken Roth Fellow
Ex-Provost, Harvard Corporation Member Will Investigate Stanford President’s Scientific Misconduct Allegations
Harvard Medical School Drops Out of U.S. News Rankings
In a swift blow to an initiative aimed at shaking up one of the stalwarts of the Harvard College curriculum, the Committee on Undergraduate Education in Economics voted down a proposal Tuesday for an alternative to the department’s introductory economics course.
Brought forth by Barker Professor of Economics Stephen A. Marglin ’59, the proposal suggested that the department offer students an alternative to the first semester of the popular Core, Social Analysis 10: “Introduction to Economics,” colloquially known as “Ec 10” and taught by Baker Professor of Economics Martin S. Feldstein.
The idea for the alternative course first appeared in a petition signed by over 700 students and alumni last month. The petition, circulated by the Students for Humane and Responsible Economics (SHARE), expressed frustration with what signers called the “conservative” slant of the class.
But the proposal has met with resistance, both from professors, who defend Feldstein’s course as sufficiently balanced, and from some students who signed a counter-petition arguing that the competing classes would segregate students along ideological lines.
The new course proposed to cover the same material as Ec 10 and to use the same basic textbook but would move at a slightly faster pace to allow time at the end of the course for critical analysis of the basic assumptions of economics, Marglin said.
But the committee, led by Maier Professor of Political Economy Benjamin M. Friedman, voted down the proposal Tuesday, saying that while the course was viable in itself, it was not an appropriate replacement for a semester of Ec 10.
“Members of the Committee unanimously thought that Professor Marglin should be encouraged to offer a version of this proposed course,” according to a statement issued by the department yesterday. “However, a clear majority of the Committee opposed having the course serve as a substitute for the first semester of Social Analysis 10.”
Committee member and Senior Lecturer on Economics Jeffrey Wolcowitz declined comment yesterday. No other committee members, including Friedman, could be reached for comment.
The proposal was first discussed in a preliminary meeting with committee members before spring break, which both Marglin and Feldstein attended. Responses were positive, according to Marglin.
“I was very surprised at the turnaround [at Tuesday’s meeting] because things looked so helpful at the first meeting,” Marglin said yesterday. “But the members clearly changed their minds.”
The proposal has one more shot to succeed, pending a vote by the full economics department scheduled for April 22.
But professors say that, in some ways, the decision is already made.
“The clear majority of the committee voted against this, and that will hold serious weight when the department votes [in two weeks],” Department of Economics Chair Oliver D. Hart said. “It’s unlikely that the proposed course will be able to serve as a substitute for Social Analysis 10.”
Students in SHARE, who met with Friedman about a month ago to discuss the proposal, said they were shocked at the outcome of Tuesday’s meeting.
“It’s completely outrageous that they rejected this after hundreds of students signed a petition,” said Daniel DiMaggio ’04, an active member of SHARE who took Ec 10 last year.
“It is ridiculous...they voted it down without student voices being heard,” said Marglin’s daughter, Jessica M. Marglin ’06, a leader of SHARE.
DiMaggio added that the rejection came as a shock.
“I’m surprised because I thought we had made progress,” DiMaggio said. “This course desperately needs an alternative. Currently, we are getting one particular type of economics, economics at expense of the poor for the rich...It channels people to think in a certain way, and since a lot of people only take Ec 10, that is their only exposure to economic classes.”
But while many students support the proposal and said that Feldstein is too biased in his presentation of the course, University President Lawrence H. Summers has said he feels that Feldstein actually takes a more objective stance in his work than Marglin.
“I think it’s probably the case that Professor Feldstein’s views are closer to the center than certainly Professor Marglin’s,” Summers told a group of students at a Quincy House Study Break in February.
“That is probably true,” said Marglin—a tenured professor in the department since 1968—in response to Summers’ comment. “But you’re looking at a very conservative spectrum and a department that has become increasingly more conservative and less diverse over the years.”
Although it looks like the alternative course will not be approved as a replacement for the fall semester of Ec 10, it could still be approved as an additional course for Core credit.
But Marglin and students said they are not satisfied—because Ec 10 remains a curriculum staple.
“The version that the Committee is suggesting I teach is not what the proposal called for at all,” Marglin said. “Most people taking Ec 10 do not pursue economics to a higher level, and offering such a course at any other level will not make sense.”
Marglin said it would be difficult to structure the course as a single-semester class, but that he plans to work with the Core office no matter what the outcome with economics department.
“There’s just too much to get in there, with the micro and macro and critiques—now it’s all back to the drawing board,” he said.
—Staff writer Lauren A.E. Schuker can be reached at email@example.com.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.