To the Editors:
Four times in the recent Crimson editorial about Expos, the authors talk about writing courses that "resemble" or "align well" with students' "interests." But eighteen-year-old freshmen often do not know what their "interests" are, or that they might change during their first year in college.
They might think their "interests" are in computer science or engineering, but a writing course founded on literature of war or free speech or art and authority or religious liberty or, in my own case (as a preceptor from 1999 to 2007), George Orwell, could awaken or at least alert them to a whole world outside.
Maybe restructuring the ancient course that all living Harvard students and most of the dead ones have taken is a good idea. But let's not claim that the reason for doing so should be to reflect the entering freshmen's "interests."
Eric Weinberger is a freelance writer living in Cambridge, and a former Expository Writing preceptor.
No Headline(Continued from first page.) (1) Such an argument would disenfranchise the majority of the educated men of the country.- (x)
Upper Class Crews Report at WeldCandidates for the upper class crews should report at the Weld Boat Club this afternoon at 4 o'clock. Coach Brown
PROF. COPELAND IN UNIONProfessor Copeland will preach a lay sermon on "Studies versus Interests and Activities," in the Dining Room of the Union
EAST IS EAST AND . . .Out of the recent torrent of discussion and disagreement about future foreign policy has come increasing evidence of the existence
The MailTo the Editor of the Crimson: I would very much like to correspond with students at your University with similar