The Faculty of Arts and Sciences voted in favor of a motion updating the program at their monthly meeting Tuesday. Dean of Undergraduate Education Jay M. Harris first introduced a different version of the motion in December. On Tuesday, the Faculty voted to accept an amendment to the motion before accepting the motion itself.
The new guidelines will take effect starting in 2020 with the class of 2024. Under the new system, students will have the option of applying to the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences as an undergraduate in order to obtain a master’s degree during their four years at the College.
Previously, students had to have pre-existing Advanced Placement or International Baccalaureate credit to apply for Advanced Standing. Undergraduates also had the option to forgo a fourth-year master’s degree and instead graduate in three years.
Though students will not be able to use AP or IB exams to receive credit from the College under the new program, individual departments will be able to use the exams for placement purposes. Students will still be able to use the exams to meet their two-semester language requirement.
At the Faculty meeting, several professors took issue with the elimination of the option to graduate in three years. Some argued there are numerous reasons students might want to pursue that path.
Computer Science Professor Harry R. Lewis ’68 said students who choose to graduate early often have a rationale that makes the decision “reasonable and worthwhile.”
“The students I know who’ve graduated in three or three and a half years don’t seem to be any less well educated than the rest, and each of them seems to have had some special, individual circumstance,” Lewis said.
Physics Professor Jennifer E. Hoffman ‘00, who noted she herself graduated in three years with advanced standing at Harvard, said she thinks personal issues like finances and health issues might motivate a student to graduate in three years.
Hoffman also gave examples of accomplished Harvard alumni who graduated under the Advanced Standing program, including current professors as well as University Provost Alan M. Garber ’77.
Lewis said he thinks the new guidelines will detrimentally affect Harvard’s ability to compete with peer institutions like Stanford and Yale in drawing students.
“All of those universities have acceleration programs. I’m sure they’d be delighted to see us end ours,” Lewis said. “Many consider it a kind of insurance when students are deciding to come here—they like knowing that if something bad happens to them or their families during their college years, they may be able to finish more quickly, and at lower cost.”
At Stanford, almost 20 percent of students participate in the “coterminal program,” their equivalent of Harvard's Advanced Standing initiative.
The Faculty also heard a presentation Tuesday from Dean of Social Sciences Claudine Gay about the University’s Inequality in America initiative, which seeks to bring together scholars from a variety of disciplines to study issues of inequality.
Gay said the initiative received over 330 applications for just two openings in their new two-year postdoctoral training program.
—Staff writer Angela N. Fu can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org. Follow her on Twitter @angelanfu.
—Staff writer Lucy Wang can be reached at email@example.com. Follow her on Twitter @lucyyloo22.
Sophomore Places Won By 11 Entering CollegeEleven former members of the Class of '60 have won sophomore standing and will skip their freshman year under the
Deans to Delay Notification of Special StatusHigh school seniors admitted to the Advanced Standing Program next fall will not know of their special status as sophomores
Six-Year Trend Broken In Advanced PlacementIn marked contrast to a trend which had held for six years, the number of freshmen seeking advanced placement in
Crimson Business CandidatesThe competition from the class of 1915 for the position of second assistant business manager of the CRIMSON will open
Faculty to Vote on Howell Motion, Discuss Changes to Advanced Standing