The Harvard examination system is designed, according to its promulgators, to test two specific things: knowledge of trends and knowledge of detail. Men approaching the examination problem have three choices: 1. flunking out, 2. doing work, or 3. working out some system of fooling the grader. The first choice of solution is too permanent and the second takes too long.
This article is designed to explain how to acheive the third answer to this perplexing problem by the use of the vague generality, the artful equivocation and the overpowering assumption.
It seems pretty obvious that in any discussion of the various methods whereby the crafty student attempts to show the grader that he knows a lot more than he actually does, the vague generality is the key device. A generality is a vague statement that means nothing by itself, but when placed in an essay on a specific subject might very well mean something to a grader. The true master of a generality is the man who can write a 10-page essay, which means nothing at all to him, and have it mean a great deal to anyone who reads it. The generality writer banks on the knowledge possessed by the grader, hoping the marker will read things into his essay.
Every non-mathematical field in the University has its own set of vague generalities. For instance:
"Hume brought empiricism to its logical extreme." (Philosophy)
"The whole thing boils down to government versus property rights." (Government)
"Moby Dick is written on three levels." (English)
"The Holy Roman Empire was neither holy, nor Roman, nor an empire." (History)
"Locke is a transitional figure." (Philosophy)
"Marx turned Hegel upside down." (Gen Ed)
"Any theory of underconsumption and purchasing power must be grounded in the psychology of the people." (Economics)
"Berlioz is the founder of modern orchestration." (Music)
"Shaws's heroes are men of moral passion." (English)
"Differentiation and integration are fundamental to the dynamic maturation of the human organism." (Social Relations)
To check the operation of a vague generality under fire, take the typical example, "Hume brought empiricism to its logical extreme." The question is asked, "Did the philosophical beliefs of Hume represent the spirit of the age in which he lived?" Our hero replies by opening his essay with "David Hume, the great Scottish philosopher, brought empiricism to its logical extreme. If these be the spirit of the age in which he lived, then he was representative of it." This generality expert has already taken his position for the essay. Actually he has not the vaguest idea of what Hume really said, or in fact what he said it in, or in fact if her ever said anything. But by never bothering to define empiricism, he may write indefinitely on the issue, virtually without contradiction.
BEATING THE SYSTEMT he Harvard examination system is designed, according to its promulgators, to test two specific things: knowledge of trends and
BEATING THE SYSTEMEDITORS NOTE: Most students have speculated, at some point or another, whether it is possible to ace Harvard exams without
Beating The SystemEDITORS NOTE: Most students have speculated, at some point or another, whether it is possible to ace Harvard exams without
Beating the SystemBy Donald Carswell ’50 The Harvard examination system is designed, according to its promulgators, to test two specific things: knowledge
Beating the System: Classic Advice for ExamsEditor's Note: The debate over how to ace Harvard exams without actually studying has raged for decades. On June 12,
Beating the SystemT HE HARVARD examination system is designed, according to its promulgators, to test two specific things, knowledge of trends and