According to the University’s announcement, chairs of both the student and faculty advisory groups––the structure of which have yet to be disclosed––will meet with the search committee “from time to time,” and members of the committee will attend meetings of the advisory groups on a regular basis. But if the search committee intends to seek the input of its advisory groups only occasionally, it will render the present advisory groups as marginally relevant as the informal groups of students and faculty with whom previous presidential search committees occasionally met.
The search committee must make it a point to incorporate feedback from advisory groups on a regular basis; open consultation should be the norm, not the exception. It is all too easy for search committees to get caught up in the exclusivity and secrecy of their nine-person world; only constant communication with and open participation by advisory group members in the workings of the search committee will enable students and faculty to offer the insights of their unique perspectives and to feel truly invested in the presidential search process. We had hoped that the search committee would never meet without the presence of students or faculty; we hope under the proposed system, at least these times will remain very rare.
To foster a sense that all students and faculty are closely tied to the presidential search process, the University must also select a diverse group of students and faculty members to populate the committees, and it must make its selections in a transparent and well-publicized manner. Including only older, more established professors and Undergraduate Council members will do little to capture the faith of the entire faculty or student body.
Should the University wish to enable a small group to secretively select another president in whom all segments of the campus population do not have confidence, it can easily do so under the presidential search system it has announced. But if members of the Corporation and Board of Overseers want to enable all segments of the University community to feel invested in the process, regular and meaningful engagement with a diverse array of advisory board members—not the infrequent and superficial consultation of years past—must be the rule.
In Search For Dean, Students Seek RoleThe Undergraduate Council (UC) last night called on Derek C. Bok to appoint two students to a faculty committee that
Corporation and Three Overseers Will Lead Presidential Search
Students Named to Presidential Search Advisory Committee
Students Must Advise, Not SelectWhile student advisory committees are not a foolproof way of ensuring student input, it would misguided for students to ever serve directly on the search committee itself.
Students Debate Qualities, Priorities of Next President at Forum