Inside the Clinic Leading Harvard's Response to Trump
Staffed by attorneys and students at Harvard Law School, the clinic provides immigrants, refugees, and asylum seekers legal support—a mission that has become all the more pressing under the Trump administration.
In just the last month, HIRC has helped the University file an amicus brief challenging Trump’s immigration order, organized a number of information sessions for immigrant students, and, most recently, released a report about the effect of Trump’s order on asylum seekers specifically.
The clinic has also hired a new staff attorney, Jason Corral, to work full-time to support undocumented students on campus, and hired clinical instructor Cindy Zapata to oversee the clinic’s expanded programs. Staffers at the clinic also helped pen an additional amicus brief opposing Trump's order.
In short, it’s been a hectic month.
Maggie J. Morgan ’04, a clinical and advocacy fellow overseeing students at the clinic, said that although it is still unclear how the executive orders will play out, there is already much to do to support clients.
“We just don’t know yet exactly how [the executive orders] will be implemented, but there’s been an enormous increase in activity in the clinic to respond to the threat posed by this administration,” Morgan said. “And there’s a lot of fear in the immigrant community, understandably so, so we’ve focused on reaching out to our clients and the immigrant community.”
As the University responds to a rapidly changing political environment and seeks to supports its international and undocumented students, HIRC has been central to its efforts.
“I think that it also gives people hope and a sense of comfort to know how many people are not just going to sit down and take whatever this administration throws at them,” Morgan said.
As part of its approach to immigration and refugee rights issues, the clinic, in conjunction with the Harvard Immigration Project—a student practice organization at the Law School—has launched the Immigration Response Initiative, an umbrella project with nine sub-projects. Among its other initiatives, members of the project have created a sanctuary campus toolkit and FAQ for students about the immigration executive order, according to Amy E. Volz, a Law School student and the co-president of HIP.
The University and Law School have stepped in to support the clinic's work. In her emails to Harvard affiliates since Trump's election, University President Drew G. Faust has repeatedly pointed to the clinic as a resource for students.
“The fact that this was in late December, so really only six weeks after we started these initiatives, that [administrators] agreed to funding to hire a clinical instructor who would oversee these projects fulltime, which to me is a huge step," Volz said. It "says a lot about the kind of support that they’re willing to give to projects that students are interested in and where there’s need in the community.”
In an emailed statement, Law School Dean Martha L. Minow wrote that she was happy to support the clinic’s programs.
“I am so glad to have been able to add new resources for the clinic and grateful to the University also for contributing sources to support the critical work of the clinic and the many students and pro bono attorneys who have come together during this challenging time,” Minow wrote.
The clinic also released a report Wednesday called “The Impact of President Trump’s Executive Orders on Asylum Seekers,” written by staff and students affiliated with the clinic.
The report details prior policies and the changes made under Trump’s three immigration-related executive orders signed in January. Specifically, the report argues that the refugees are no longer safe in the United States, which complicates a refugee exchange agreement that the United States has with Canada.
The report has already gained significant traction in Canada, where legislators are considering suspending the refugee agreement, clinic director and Law School professor Deborah E. Anker said.
“We’re responding to requests from our Canadian colleagues to develop arguments about the safe third country agreement with Canada,” Anker said. “We’ve been very involved in this issue since 2004 when the agreement went into effect.”
Inside the Clinic
Like most clinics at the Law School, the clinic accepts Law School students through a lottery program that takes place one semester prior to joining the clinic.
Morgan said there was a significant uptick in interest in the clinic following Trump’s election and his subsequent executive orders on immigration and refugees.
Volz said that over 300 students have signed up to get involved with the programs.
“We have generally just received a ton of interest since the election, but it has certainly intensified in the last few weeks,” Volz said. “People will email us to see how they can get involved, and we’ve just been signing people up for initiative listservs in the hope that they can get involved in the project in the near future.”
While efforts related to litigation and legal research are mostly limited to Law School affiliates, other programs, like interpreting, are available to undergraduates, and Volz said they continue to encourage students to get involved.
Morgan said Law School students are essential to the clinic’s activities, and work directly representing clients in court.
“Students are critical to our work,” Morgan said. “We wouldn’t be able to do the work we do without student involvement and students in the clinic itself. They represent clients and they take a case, often times, from start to finished.”
According to Morgan, more local attorneys have also been interested in the clinic’s activities since the election. She also said the clinic has run a series of know-your-rights programs and clinics in the Boston area to help directly local individuals with immigration-related concerns.
Anker said many clients find the clinic on their own or are referred to its services by Greater Boston Legal Services, where the clinic has an office at its downtown location.
“They’ve been around for a hundred years and have developed strong ties with immigrant communities, so they refer cases to us. They also represent people, and we actually have a clinical instructor down at Greater Boston Legal Services,” Anker said.
Morgan said that while the student interest is encouraging, plenty of work remains.
“There’s been a whirlwind of harmful activity in the last several weeks, but there’s also been a lot of resistance that’s been quite successful so far and we hope that that continues,” Morgan said. “There is a lot of legal resistance and litigation that is being filed, and that will be filed in the future, to check [Trump's] abuse of his authority.”
—Staff writer Jamie D. Halper can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org. Follow her on Twitter @JamieDHalper.
Law Clinicians, Faculty Sign Amicus Brief Against Executive OrderFour Harvard faculty members signed onto an amicus brief filed in a federal appeals court Sunday night to support a legal challenge to President Donald Trump’s immigration order.
Law School Clinic Files Amicus Brief Against Trump’s Immigration OrderThe Harvard Immigration and Refugee Clinic filed Thursday an amicus brief challenging President Donald Trump’s seven-country immigration ban.
GSAS Students Seek to Publicize Immigration Resources
Trump’s TPS Changes Could Affect Dozens at HarvardDozens of Harvard affiliates remain uncertain about their futures after government officials announced changes to the Temporary Protected Status program this month.
TPS Recipients Ask for Increased Legal SupportPresident Donald Trump’s recent repeal of Temporary Protected Status has led some student activists and TPS recipients to argue that the University should hire more staff for the Harvard Immigration and Refugee Clinic.