Residents Demand Answers at Council Meeting on Police Killing of Sayed Faisal


Bob Odenkirk Named Hasty Pudding Man of the Year


Harvard Kennedy School Dean Reverses Course, Will Name Ken Roth Fellow


Ex-Provost, Harvard Corporation Member Will Investigate Stanford President’s Scientific Misconduct Allegations


Harvard Medical School Drops Out of U.S. News Rankings

Harvard Law School Librarians Celebrate Freedom to Read in Banned Books Read Out

Harvard Law School librarians and staff members read from their favorite banned books on the steps of the Harvard Law School library.
Harvard Law School librarians and staff members read from their favorite banned books on the steps of the Harvard Law School library. By Sophia S. Kim
By Ryan H. Doan-Nguyen, Crimson Staff Writer

Patrons looking to enter the Harvard Law School library Wednesday afternoon had to navigate around a dozen librarians and staff members, who crowded the front steps as they took turns reading aloud selections from their favorite banned books and authors.

The readout, which the Law School library has hosted since 2016, commemorates the 40th annual Banned Books Week — a nationwide campaign to fight censorship, spotlight persecuted individuals, and celebrate the freedom to read under the First Amendment’s free speech protections.

Featured works included Margaret Atwood’s “The Handmaid’s Tale,” Tim O’Brien’s “The Things They Carried,” Anne Frank’s “The Diary of a Young Girl,” Isaac Babel’s “Odessa Stories,” and Alison Bechdel’s “Fun Home.”

“It really was to help people understand that their ability to read whatever they want might be limited at some point in the future and how important it is for us in a place that celebrates intellectual freedom to champion access to books,” said HLS Library Executive Director Jocelyn B. Kennedy, who moderated the event.

Kennedy, who read excerpts from Toni Morrison's “The Bluest Eye,” George Orwell’s “1984,” and James Joyce’s “Ulysses,” said today’s most commonly challenged books discuss LGBTQ+ issues and racial justice, among other socially sensitive topics. She emphasized that having free access to books is crucial in generating difficult but necessary conversation and called attention to the rising censorship of books across the country.

“That's a human harm,” she said, “Why I think it's problematic is a person or a group of people are deciding on behalf of everybody what you can and cannot have access to — what you can and cannot hear or know.”

According to Kennedy, 2021 saw the challenging and banning of over 1,500 different books in the United States, a figure that has already been exceeded in 2022. A book is considered challenged when there is an attempt to remove or restrict it.

“It's getting worse,” Kennedy said. “There's something about the world that we're living in today that is leading people to challenge books more than ever before.”

The weeklong commemoration — spanning from Sept. 18 to 24 — was founded by the American Library Association following the 1982 Supreme Court case Island Trees School District v. Pico. High school senior Steven Pico and four peers challenged a New York school board’s decision to remove nine books, including Kurt Vonnegut’s “Slaughterhouse-Five” and Langston Hughes’s “Best Short Stories by Negro Writers,” from the district’s junior high and high school libraries.

“The reality is that it's been happening always,” Kennedy said. “We've always banned books. It's human nature to want to suppress anything that’s different.”

Lesliediana Jones, the HLS Library associate director for public services and chair of the American Library Association’s Intellectual Freedom Committee, talked about the challenges librarians and educators face in supporting the free exchange of ideas that books provide.

Jones, who read a passage from Angie Thomas’ “The Hate U Give,” said librarians are “regularly being challenged, being threatened” and that some are “losing their job over books that are in their library — that are on the banned books list — and books that they want their students to read.”

“It has been for many of them a very traumatic experience, and many of them have left the profession,” she added.

In a video posted to Harvard’s social media accounts, Jones said, “Everyone has the right to read. That’s in the Constitution. We all have the right to read whatever we please.”

—Staff writer Ryan H. Doan-Nguyen can be reached at Follow him on Twitter @ryandoannguyen.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

BooksHarvard Law SchoolEvents