News
Progressive Labor Party Organizes Solidarity March With Harvard Yard Encampment
News
Encampment Protesters Briefly Raise 3 Palestinian Flags Over Harvard Yard
News
Mayor Wu Cancels Harvard Event After Affinity Groups Withdraw Over Emerson Encampment Police Response
News
Harvard Yard To Remain Indefinitely Closed Amid Encampment
News
HUPD Chief Says Harvard Yard Encampment is Peaceful, Defends Students’ Right to Protest
Stressing the value of a balance of power between state and federal governments as opposed to a strong centralized administration, Edward J. Duggan '37 upheld the negative and gave the rebuttal for Harvard in the radio debate with Dartmouth yesterday at 3 o'clock over station WNAC.
No decision was returned in the contest, which was on the question of government control of commerce and industry within the national boundaries. Emphasizing the political side of the argument, Duggan maintained that too much concentration of power in the hands of the federal government is a bad thing for the country, and that the "federal equilibrium" should be preserved.
Richard W. Sullivan '38, the other Crimson speaker, advanced the argument of the inflexibility of Congress in legislation and of its lack of adaptability to individual cases.
Arthur Ekirch '37, speaking first for Dartmouth, traced the economic development of the country from the old days of "laissez-faire" to the complicated interrelations of our modern financial structure.
The affirmative speech of Herman Dock, Dartmouth '36, was largely composed of a mass of detail to support the point of the inability of congress to regulate utility companies under the present setup.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.