News
Progressive Labor Party Organizes Solidarity March With Harvard Yard Encampment
News
Encampment Protesters Briefly Raise 3 Palestinian Flags Over Harvard Yard
News
Mayor Wu Cancels Harvard Event After Affinity Groups Withdraw Over Emerson Encampment Police Response
News
Harvard Yard To Remain Indefinitely Closed Amid Encampment
News
HUPD Chief Says Harvard Yard Encampment is Peaceful, Defends Students’ Right to Protest
The ethics of scientific research are a problem, Everett I. Mendelsohn, professor of the History of Science, said, because it is unclear to whom scientists are accountable for their work.
Mendelsohn and Miriam Schweber, research associate in Biology, discussed yesterday "Ethical Choices for Science" as part of a symposium at the Cronkhite Graduate Center.
Addressing the topic "Nuclear Energy, Weapons, and Scientists," Mendelsohn said scientists have followed the notion that "expert knowledge and technique are for hire."
The original research to develop the atomic bomb was governed by a "strong ethos to win a war," Mendelsohn said, adding, however, this was secondary to the scientists' desire to achieve technical success.
Schweber, noting that there is "no regulation at all at the application level," only at the research level, finds fault in a political system which says "how knowledge can be acquired but not how it can be applied."
She said there is a conflict of interest when scientists, who are the "motive intellectual power" for private industry and research, are also "the regulators at the national level of what should or should not be done" in scientific research.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.