There were single games one year ago in which that might have been his stat line if Harvard coach Tim Murphy had just let him play all four quarters.
Sure, some of that decline is the product of the dismal conditions in the Crimson’s opener against Holy Cross, during which Fitzpatrick completed seven of 15 attempts for 79 yards. But even discounting the act of God that descended on Cambridge that day, his numbers are still down.
And it doesn’t matter. Fitzpatrick is better now than he ever was in 2003.
Does that mean he’ll win the Payton Award this year? Probably not. The totals he puts up by year’s end won’t be as high as those of many of his competitors, and voters who haven’t seen him in person will overlook him as a result.
But will that translate into an Ivy title?
Given the stocked offensive arsenal around him, Fitzpatrick could easily replicate his pre-injury performances. A year ago, Brian Edwards was the only proven and reliable target each week. Now, he and Corey Mazza spread opposing secondaries paper-thin.
It’s not hard to imagine Fitzpatrick throwing to that duo for 400 yards a game. After all, one of them is bound to find single coverage on each down. Given his well-established accuracy, Fitzpatrick shouldn’t have much difficulty finding them.
So far this year, on those limited occasions when the quarterback has taken a chance downfield, he and his receivers have met favorable results—two touchdowns against no interceptions. And, as he has shown in flashes, Fitzpatrick has lost none of his trademark mobility.
Yet the number of deep balls he attempts has gone down. And instead of scrambling for first downs, breaking tackles, and leaving defenders grasping at air, Fitzpatrick regularly dives in anticipation of their approach, accepting shorter gains time and again.
So, given all that, how exactly is he a better quarterback than a year ago?
For one, Fitzpatrick—formerly the invulnerable signal caller who escaped injury time and again by the thinnest of margins—is playing as though he learned from his compulsory time on the sidelines last season.
Spectacular though some of his single-play efforts may have been a year ago, they weren’t worth the broken hand and torn-up knee that arguably arose from the style of play that produced them.
Slipping through a collapsing wall of linebackers may earn a few extra yards. Avoiding that contact altogether may earn a few thousand, and will certainly protect a few extra wins.
And Fitzpatrick appreciates the offensive transformation that occurred in his absence last year. When he went down, he was the best runner on the team. Upon his return, Dawson had assumed that mantle and become the centerpiece of the offense.