News
Pro-Palestine Encampment Represents First Major Test for Harvard President Alan Garber
News
Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu Condemns Antisemitism at U.S. Colleges Amid Encampment at Harvard
News
‘A Joke’: Nikole Hannah-Jones Says Harvard Should Spend More on Legacy of Slavery Initiative
News
Massachusetts ACLU Demands Harvard Reinstate PSC in Letter
News
LIVE UPDATES: Pro-Palestine Protesters Begin Encampment in Harvard Yard
Beneficial Professor of Law Charles Fried aims high in his new book,
“Modern Liberty and the Limits of Government.” Early on in this
discussion of liberty in the modern era, he stakes his claim “to do for
our time and liberal democratic societies what Friedrich Hayek did some
sixty years ago in The Road to Serfdom.”
Does he reach his goal?
Is “Modern Liberty” a profound political tract, one that is likely to
gladden some and infuriate many? Does he deliver a novel critique of
today’s society, one as fresh as Hayek’s claim that the loss of
economic liberty is the first step toward fascism?
Not even close.
Fried delivers a strong discussion of contemporary liberty,
sharing his ample knowledge of public policy and giving the reader a
breathtakingly nuanced review of an often elusive concept.
But he spends far too long discussing liberty in a vacuum
before bringing in the real world. While his review of the
philosophical tradition is enlightening—and even well-versed readers
will learn much—he fails to provide major new insights. He marshals the
thoughts of great philosophers convincingly, but he relies on them too
extensively to make his own case.
And this is sad, for when Fried’s own thoughts break through, he has a knack for stating things as pithily as possible.
What characterizes liberty, he asks? “Individuals come first,” he writes. What is the enemy of liberty? “Some vision of good.”
The book becomes far more enjoyable when Fried starts to
discuss our modern government, drawing on his years of government
experience, first as solicitor general and later as a justice on the
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court.
His thoughts on liberty of the mind, especially on the First
Amendment, are excellent food for thought in this time of political
demagoguery. Likewise, his treatment of sexual liberty is wonderfully
balanced—he challenges the most basic assumptions held by dogmatic
liberals and conservatives alike.
It is worth noting, however, that Fried does this by relying on a
tried-and-true formula: he quickly tacks to the libertarian position
and proceeds to flagellate the moralists on both sides.
In the end, readers looking for a slim, thought-provoking
volume on political liberty and contemporary governance, “Modern
Liberty” is a good choice.
But those seeking the originality and insight of “The Road to
Serfdom” are likely to be disappointed. Fried’s biggest mistake is an
all-too-simple one—he sets the bar too high.
—Reviewer Paras D. Bhayani can be reached at pbhayani@fas.harvard.edu.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.