Some political alliances are born out of necessity.
But Undergraduate Council presidential candidate Spenser R. Goodman ’14 and UC vice-presidential candidate Darren C. McLeod ’14 have been friends since before freshman year.
Before they even formally matriculated to the College, they were scrubbing bathrooms for Dorm Crew. Later that year, they would be working side-by-side as freshman UC representatives.
Now, the pair is teaming up again, this time in a bid to run the student government organization that they joined together two years ago.
“It was never about the title,” Goodman says, describing his ambition to fill the top role. “Since day one of freshman year, this is what we’ve been working towards and what we’ve been working on. This is a chance for us to take what we’ve done and what we want to do and make real, lasting changes for the school and for the UC.”
Their platform is concise and, in some ways, strikingly bold.
Goodman and McLeod focus on three goals to bolster a higher objective of expanding social life on campus: reforming the UC’s social programs committee, restructuring the UC’s committee system, and encouraging administrators to change social life policy.
But Goodman emphasizes that these changes to campus life would expand beyond “dancing and parties,” adding that he and McLeod would work to promote sporting events, concerts, talks, and plays.
“We have a different vision for the direction that the Undergraduate Council should be going,” he says.
“The other three tickets are all very similar. If you took their names off of their platforms, they would be the exact same, and no one would be able to identify any differences. They are all on one side, and we are on the other.”
For Goodman, it’s all about the specifics. Goodman says that social life at Harvard is not—but should be—the highest priority for the UC.
In drawing up their platform, Goodman and McLeod say that he deliberately tried to choose achievable reforms to the governing body.
“We are really committed to seeing a change in social life here at Harvard,” Goodman says.
Goodman and McLeod see the Social Programs Committee as the primary vehicle for this change.
WTF is going on with the UC Election?Shit's hitting the fan at the Undergraduate Council. We'll keep you updated, both here and at TheCrimson.com, as developments emerge.
UC VP Disavows E-Mail Alleging Voting Fraud, While E-Mail Contributor Insists VP ‘Clicked Send’Behind the confusion and controversy swirling around yesterday’s unresolved Undergraduate Council elections remains an e-mail sent last night from the UC president’s e-mail account bearing the signature of UC Vice President Kia J. McLeod ’10 suggesting that vice presidential candidate Eric N. Hysen ’11 may have had access to voting software.
UC Decision Pending Amid Claims of FraudAfter a two and a half hour Undergraduate Council Executive Board meeting yesterday, there is still no UC president-elect. But a vote that could make John F. Bowman ’11 the next Council president is set to take place at today’s UC General meeting.
Fallout of UC Election Colored By Allegations of Misconduct, Internal Dissension, and Incriminating E-mailsThree days after the ending of the closest Undergraduate Council presidential election in recent history, while the UC finalizes plans to pass judgment on vote tallies that remain decertified today, a series of interviews by The Crimson shed some light on Friday’s confused outcome and the questions that may define the discourse on what remains to be done.
Undergraduate Council Votes to Censure VP After Election ScandalThe Undergraduate Council voted to censure outgoing UC Vice President Kia J. McLeod ’10 for her role in the controversial November presidential election.