News

Pro-Palestine Encampment Represents First Major Test for Harvard President Alan Garber

News

Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu Condemns Antisemitism at U.S. Colleges Amid Encampment at Harvard

News

‘A Joke’: Nikole Hannah-Jones Says Harvard Should Spend More on Legacy of Slavery Initiative

News

Massachusetts ACLU Demands Harvard Reinstate PSC in Letter

News

LIVE UPDATES: Pro-Palestine Protesters Begin Encampment in Harvard Yard

New FAS Policy Budget Questioned

By Noah S. Rayman and Elyssa A. L. Spitzer, Crimson Staff Writers

Faculty members confronted Faculty of Arts and Sciences Dean Michael D. Smith yesterday with a barrage of questions about recently implemented budgeting measures that will grant him more authority than ever before in determining where FAS centers direct their funds.

Smith responded to faculty members’ concerns by saying that their angst was the result of miscommunication about the policy.

The new budgeting strategy, known as the “first-dollar principle,” requires that departments and centers spend their restricted funds according to thus far unspecified FAS “core principles.” Since area study centers—such as the Center for European Studies—are traditionally autonomous units that depend largely on restricted endowments and donations, center administrators were concerned about losing control of their spending priorities.

“The governance of the centers has always been in the hands of the faculty associated with them in partnership with FAS,” said Susan J. Pharr, director of Harvard’s Reischauer Institute of Japanese Studies. According to Pharr, Smith had reassured center leaders at a meeting on Friday that he would refrain from taking full control of their budgets.

“But let’s be clear, under the new budget paradigm, the dean claims the right to do so,” she said.

David G. Blackbourn, the director of the CES, rose to support Pharr’s opening statement.

“What, sir, it seems you are asking now is to take control, and this raises serious questions of what a center director is trying to do,” Blackbourn said to Smith.

Blackbourn also emphasized his concerns that donors—on whom centers rely heavily—might be unwilling to contribute if they believe their funds will be used for FAS priorities rather than those of the particular center.

Responding to each of the five center-affiliated professors who voiced concerns, Smith confirmed that the “first-dollar principle” will not enable FAS administrators to use center restricted funds outside the precepts laid out by the donor.

Smith said that “core principles” for spending—a term used in a budgeting letter sent out to department and center administrators clarifying the new policy—would be determined in conjunction with center administrators.

“I have no idea what that priorities are of your center until you tell me,” he said.

University President Drew G. Faust supported Smith in his defense of the new FAS policy, asking centers to participate in what she said was a new phase of the school’s response to the budget crisis that has left FAS with an $80 million deficit—down from $220 last academic year.

“I would hope that no unit would want to be immune to that kind of questioning and priority setting,” Faust said.

But some professors proposed that Smith rewrite the budgeting letter and hold a town hall-style meeting for concerned members of the community.

At yesterday’s meeting, the Faculty unanimously approved the integration of global health policy into the current secondary field in health policy.

Economics Professor David M. Cutler ’87 said that the new Standing Committee on Global Health and Health Policy will create an “umbrella” for studies in domestic health policy—already a popular secondary among undergraduates. Studies in global health policy are currently limited to General Education courses and interdisciplinary courses in other concentrations.

“It will allow us to provide a home for courses that are currently taught where there is no home for them,” Cutler said.

Harvard’s School of Engineering and Applied Sciences will also see a new concentration in Biomedical Engineering following a unanimous vote at yesterday’s meeting. Bioengineering Professor David J. Mooney said that field is becoming increasingly relevant in the engineering world.

Though students have already been focusing on biomedical engineering studies, Mooney said the new concentration will build an academic path that includes courses in chemistry and biology in addition to other SEAS courses.

“Harvard has a responsibility to train the future leaders of this field,” Mooney said.

—Staff writer Noah S. Rayman can be reached at nrayman@fas.harvard.edu

—Staff writer Elyssa A.L. Spitzer can be reached at spitzer@fas.harvard.edu.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags
FAS AdministrationUniversity FinancesDrew Faust