For First Time in 20 Years, A Harvard Duo Captures World Debate Crown

World Debate Champions
Courtesy of Ben D. Sprung-Keyser

Ben D. Sprung-Keyser '15, left, and Joshua P. Zoffer ’14, right, won the 34th World Universities Debating Championship in Chennai, India in early January.

Ben D. Sprung-Keyser ’15 and Joshua P. Zoffer ’14 emerged victorious in the 34th World Universities Debating Championship last week, becoming the first Harvard team to win the competition, called “Worlds,” in over 20 years.

Students from over 300 universities competed in the prestigious international tournament, which is hosted annually by the World Universities Debating Council and was held in Chennai, India from Dec. 28 to Jan. 3.

Zoffer and Sprung-Keyser won after debating the adoption of “radical free-market policies” in the final round of the contest.

“When we heard the topic, we were ecstatic,” Zoffer, who was still out of the country, wrote in an email to The Crimson.


“Economics is their turf,” said Cormac A. Early ’09, a former Harvard debater who helped train the team. “It’s almost like they had home-field advantage.”

Sprung-Keyser, an economics concentrator, had recently researched Indian labor markets, and Zoffer studies economic history. In the final debate, they discussed labor market reforms, foreign direct investment, and the privatization of state-owned enterprises, among other issues.

“We were happy that we got to talk about something we really care about,” Sprung-Keyser said.

Tournament participants compete in the British parliamentary debate format, which, according to the team’s coach and Kennedy School student Julia L. Fetherston, differs vastly from formats popular in the United States.

“Preparing a team for Worlds is like helping an NFL player switch to soccer or rugby—within six months,” she said.

Contestants are assigned topics fifteen minutes before debate begins, and according to Fetherston, this year’s tournament featured topics that ranged from cosmetic surgery to drug policy. The diversity of possible topics, she said, demands “a wide general knowledge that makes the format particularly challenging—and the wonderful performances even more impressive.”

Sprung-Keyser and Zoffer began preparing for the tournament last year by reading about current events, watching videos of past debates, and competing in tournaments at Yale University, the University of Toronto, and the University of Cambridge.

They also brought in former debaters like Early, who had competed at Worlds four times and reached the final round twice, for practice rounds. Early, a former Crimson editorial editor, said that he advised the duo “to be a little more relaxed when speaking and to dig deeper” into important arguments.

“In Worlds, there’s less of a premium on making a lot of arguments—spitballing and hoping things will stick—and more of a premium on speaking well,” he said.

Fetherston said Sprung-Keyser and Zoffer had focused particularly on improving their performance in the “opening government” position, which entails speaking first and arguing in favor of the given motion. They were assigned to this position in the final round.