Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor Talks Justice, Civic Engagement at Radcliffe Day


Church Says It Did Not Authorize ‘People’s Commencement’ Protest After Harvard Graduation Walkout


‘Welcome to the Battlefield’: Maria Ressa Talks Tech, Fascism in Harvard Commencement Address


In Photos: Harvard’s 373rd Commencement Exercises


Rabbi Zarchi Confronted Maria Ressa, Walked Off Stage Over Her Harvard Commencement Speech

Sachee and Khansarinia Win UC Presidential Election

Yasmin Z. Sachee ’18 and Cameron K. Khansarinia ’18 will be the next Undergraduate Council President and Vice President.
Yasmin Z. Sachee ’18 and Cameron K. Khansarinia ’18 will be the next Undergraduate Council President and Vice President. By Helen Y. Wu
By Brian P. Yu, Crimson Staff Writer

UPDATED: November 18, 2016 at 4:35 a.m.

Yasmin Z. Sachee ’18 and Cameron K. Khansarinia ’18 will be the next Undergraduate Council President and Vice President after an hours-long investigation found there was insufficient evidence that the pair had violated campaign rules, according to UC Election Commission Chair Matthew C. Estes ’18.

“We are just so absolutely thrilled and grateful and thankful to the student body for putting their support in us and for believing in our vision, and we look forward to… making a lot of changes this year,” Sachee said.

At 9 p.m. Thursday, the UC executive board held a last-minute meeting in response to allegations that Sachee and Khansarinia violated election rules. In the meeting, which current UC President Shaiba Rather ’17 described as “urgent” in an email to UC executives, the board voted to grant the Election Commission more time to certify the results of the election. The investigation reviewed “whether or not their campaign was involved in any sort of coercive activity”—allegations that had been brought against the UC ticket Thursday morning—according to Estes. Estes declined to comment further on the nature of the investigation.

All executive board members other than UC Vice President Daniel V. Banks ’17 and Student Life Committee Chair Berkeley Brown ’18 were in attendance at Thursday night’s meeting.

Early Friday morning, the five members of the UC Election Commission—who are independent of the UC’s executive board—unanimously agreed that there was insufficient evidence to conclude that Sachee and Khansarinia’s campaign had “in any way engaged in coercive behavior.”

According to three individuals with direct knowledge of the executive board meeting’s proceedings, the allegation concerned whether incoming members of the Bee Club, Harvard’s oldest female final club, were coerced into voting for or assisting in the campaign for Sachee, a Bee Club member, and Khansarinia. Ultimately, the committee ruled that there was “not a case to be made” that their campaign had violated the rules.

Sachee and Khansarinia edged out three other tickets: Scott Ely ’18 and Evan M. Bonsall ’19, Eduardo A. Gonzalez ’18 and Alex Popovski ’19, and Grant S. Solomon ’18 and Alexander T. Moore ’18.

Sachee and Khansarinia received the most number of first-choice votes, with 1,325 undergraduates listing them as their first choice. Gonzalez and Popovski received the second-greatest number of first-choice votes with 1,028 votes. Ely and Bonsall received 521 first-choice votes, and Solomon and Moore received 168 first-choice votes.

During the voting period, 3,042 undergraduates cast ballots for the UC presidency, a slight increase over last election’s 2,898 ballots.

Voting for this year’s UC presidential election ended Thursday at noon. The UC Election Commission typically has 24 hours after the end of the voting period—or until Friday at noon—to calculate and certify the results of the election. Because of the executive board vote, the Commission had extended its deadline to Saturday at noon—though the Commission announced the winners just after 1:30 a.m. Friday.

Undergraduates also voted on three referendum questions during the election.

The first question, which asked students whether they thought the College should repeal its sanctions on unrecognized single-gender social organizations, passed. Because the policy was formulated by the College itself, the referendum has no bearing on whether the sanctions will go into effect.

The other two questions—one that asked whether the Harvard Turkey should become the official mascot of the University, and another that questioned whether unrecognized single-gender social organizations should go co-ed—did not pass.

—Staff writer Brian P. Yu can be reached at Follow him on Twitter @brianyu28.

—Crimson photographer Helen Y. Wu contributed reporting to this story.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Undergraduate CouncilBreaking NewsFront FeatureCollege News