Advertisement

Panel Reflects on Said’s Legacy, Orientalism

Justin H. Haan

Rothenberg Professor HOMI K. BHABHA (left) moderates a discussion about Edward Said and his book, Orientalism, in which Professor LOUIS MENAND participated.

Edward Said’s assault on orientalist thinking changed the way that societies examine foreign cultures, four experts said last night in memory of the deceased author.

Said, an academic, journalist, writer and activist for Palestinian causes, died in September of leukemia. His 1978 book, Orientalism, critiqued western conceptualizations of eastern cultures.

William Granara, Gray professor of the practice of Arabic, who was one of four panelists that took part in the roundtable discussion sponsored by the Humanities Center, began his portion of the program with a confession—in jest.

“My name is William Granara, and I’m an Orientalist,” he said last night to the packed crowd at the Sackler Museum Lecture Hall.

Granara said Said rocked the field of Arabic literary scholarship and challenged its academics to look beyond their imaginative boundaries.

“Political correctness hit students like myself like a bolt of lightning, and the fear of being called Orientalist cast a dark shadow over our institutions,” he said of Said’s effect on his own education.

Advertisement

The panel, moderated by Rothenberg Professor of English and American Literature and Language Homi K. Bhabha, also featured Assistant Professor Sharmila Sen ’92 and Professor Louis Menand, both from the Department of English and American Literature and Language.

Sen, a specialist in postcolonial studies, said that though it had never been assigned reading in her undergraduate experience, Orientalism was expected knowledge during her graduate school tenure.

“[It is] both the foundational text and the ghost within the field,” she said.

Urging for Said to be viewed from the literary perspective, Sen closed her presentation by saying, “Now perhaps more than before we need to return Orientalism to its home of literary studies and read it alongside literature and read it, indeed, literarily.”

Remembering Said’s place in New York intellectual culture, Menand described him as well-respected and prominent in literary, academic and journalistic circles.

“He was a figure. He would have been distinguished in any company,” said Menand. “He was like Cary Grant.”

Characterizing Said as a man of many facets, Menand said Said struggled to reconcile the seemingly paradoxical intellectual and activist impulses.

“That was what Edward was about,” he said. “He was about making what humanists do important and relevant to the world.”

While each of the panelists spent some time recalling Said and his personal profundity, more was said of Orientalism.

“Elegies are inappropriate for the likes of Edward Said,” said Bhabha, “Let Edward Said have the last word.”

Last night’s session was the third in a series sponsored by the Humanities Center. The sessions are intended to provoke dialogue on issues of “vital importance on literary culture studies and theory,” said the Center’s director, Kenan Professor of English Marjorie Garber.

Advertisement