Undergraduates Celebrate Second Consecutive Virtual Housing Day


Dean of Students Office Discusses Housing Day, Anti-Racism Goals


Renowned Cardiologist and Nobel Peace Prize Winner Bernard Lown Dies at 99


Native American Nonprofit Accuses Harvard of Violating Federal Graves Protection and Repatriation Act


U.S. Reps Assess Biden’s Progress on Immigration at HKS Event

Former Dean Questions Response to Professor's Past Financial Ties to Libya’s Gaddafi

By Gautam S. Kumar and Sirui Li, Crimson Staff Writers

Computer Science Professor and former Dean of the College Harry R. Lewis ’68 questioned University President Drew G. Faust on whether the University should actively criticize University Professor Michael E. Porter for his financial ties with Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi.

At yesterday’s Faculty meeting, Lewis chided Porter for a 2006 report to the Libyan government on the part of his private consulting firm, Monitor Consulting Group, which repeatedly dubbed the regime a “popular” and “direct” democracy. Lewis said that Porter’s actions represented Harvard in a poor light, negatively affecting its global image.

“Harvard rightfully expresses its pride when a member of our community does something noble,” Lewis said. “I wonder if the University should not also express its shame when a faculty member disgraces the University.”

The Faculty meeting was otherwise largely policy-oriented, developing next year’s Optional Winter Activities Week and endorsing scheduling morning classes on Fridays next semester.

Following concerns expressed by faculty members and students about a lack of transparency in the process, Faust also summarized the University’s decision to repeal a ban on Reserve Officers’ Training Corps.


Lewis addressed Faust after the University president had closed her presentation for the meeting.

“I don’t know that Professor Porter broke any laws or University rules, and I would not want any new regulatory apparatus,” Lewis said. “Yet taking money to support a tyranny by dubbing it a democracy is wrong.”

In February 2006, Porter presented a 200-page document to officials in Tripoli as a consultant to Monitor, a firm formed by several Harvard professors that was under several million-dollar contracts with the country.

In the report, Porter argued that Libya “has the only functioning example of direct democracy on a national level,” and that Libyans were able to directly contribute to the decision-making process, which drew heavy fire from Lewis in yesterday’s Faculty meeting.

“To put it simply, a tyrant wanted a crimson-tinged report that he was running a democracy,” Lewis said, bringing up the question of whether the University should acknowledge the “shame” when a faculty member disgraces the University in such a way.

“Shouldn’t Harvard acknowledge its embarrassment, and might you remind us that when we parlay our status as Harvard professors for personal profit, we can hurt both the University and all of its members?” Lewis said.

In response to Lewis’ criticism, Faust said that it was not the president’s responsibility to serve as “public scolder-in-chief.”

She said that Harvard recently conducted a review of the University’s policies on conflict of interest. But she said it should also be the University’s priority to support all faculty members to pursue academic inquiry.


Faust offered a brief summary of the decisions that led to the return of ROTC to campus.

Her comments came less than a week after a Columbia university-wide legislative body made up of students, faculty, and staff announced their support for ROTC on campus. That move raised concerns at Harvard among students and the Faculty about the transparency of Harvard’s own process to recognize ROTC.

Faust said University President Neil L. Rudenstine established a committee in the 1990s that pivoted the ban of ROTC on the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” legislation. Once Congress repealed the policy, she said, the University could no longer legitimize banning ROTC.

“I viewed the repeal of DADT as a significant step towards inclusiveness,” Faust said.


Acknowledging that Friday “has become a day that is under-scheduled,” Dean of Undergraduate Education Jay M. Harris said that planning seminars to accommodate for athletes and students with inflexible afternoon responsibilities has become increasingly difficult.

Currently, no class longer than an hour can be scheduled before 1 p.m. on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays. Classes before 1 p.m. on Tuesday and Thursday can be up to 1.5 hours.

But Harris said that longer seminar classes back loaded in the afternoon leave only a small window for students who juggle other activities during that time.

Harris also announced a Faculty decision to facilitate Harvard students who are not concentrating in Music but want to continue cross-registering at the New England Conservatory.

The policy change would allow students to take one or two courses in a term at the New England Conservatory.

—Staff writer Gautam S. Kumar can be reached at

—Staff writer Sirui Li can be reached

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

FAS AdministrationFaculty