This has been a great year for film, specifically for the black community. Six black actors were nominated: Denzel Washington and Viola Davis for “Fences,” Ruth Negga for “Loving,” Mahershala Ali for “Moonlight,” Naomie Harris for “Moonlight,” and Octavia Spencer for “Hidden Figures.” “Moonlight” is the story of a young boy growing up, finding himself, and grappling with his sexuality. “Hidden Figures” is an inspiring history lesson on the critical role black women played in the Space Race. Masterly documentaries “13th,” “O.J.: Made in America,”and “I Am Not Your Negro” are exposés on black life.
This year’s nominations could instigate a permanent movement toward more inclusivity and diversity, a shift TV has pioneered. “Atlanta”, “Orange is the New Black”, and “Jane the Virgin” are among some of the countless TV shows that feature and tell the stories of people of color. Hollywood seems to be following television’s lead. The crucial difference between the two, however, is that a TV show can last years, whereas the film industry has to consistently greenlight a large variety of films featuring actors of color, something it hasn’t always done in the past and may not do in the future. Now more than ever, pushing the industry in the right direction requires not only people in front of the camera, but behind the camera as well, as directors, writers, and cinematographers.
Unfortunately, this year could be a one-off, indulgent attempt on the Academy’s part to avoid the intense backlash it received over the last two years. Alternatively, the Academy may have recognized so many black actors and films in an effort to overshadow the lack of non-black nominees of color, with the exception of Dev Patel for “Lion,” or the lack of female directors and cinematographers. It may even be an attempt to distract us from the controversial nominations of Casey Affleck and Mel Gibson, the former of whom has been accused of sexual assault, and the latter of whom has made racist, homophobic, anti-Semitic, and misogynistic comments. In the aftermath of a year that has seen white men rewarded in spite of shameful behavior, this would come as no surprise.
While some of the Oscars’ choices have been dubious—both in terms of artists it nominates and nominees that win—there is no denying that recognition from the Academy automatically both validates and publicizes nominees. Recognition invariably pushes audiences to go see the nominated movies, which means encouraging people to see a few more movies with people of color this year than they would otherwise. In an industry in which money and critical acclaim are the chief sources of opportunities for artists, this could propel a new generation of actors, directors, and writers of color into the limelight.
Only time will tell if this becomes a short-lived trend or if it is a genuine effort the Academy is making to be more inclusive. And while this is a step in the right direction, it is ultimately only a balm to the bigger issues at hand. Extreme backlash, which didn’t even work to diversify last year’s nominations, shouldn’t be what forces Hollywood to recognize works of art by people of color. Nor should the film industry be praised when it does. While the industry is far from getting to where it needs to be, it will finally cross the finish line once diversity, albeit more and more recognized, becomes something that is regularly delivered, and not thrown in as an apology for its past.
—Staff writer Mila Gauvin II can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org
Union Nominations Close TodayToday is the last day on which petitions may be submitted for the nomination of new members of the Union
'94 Class Meeting.The sophomore class meeting came to order at five minutes of seven last evening, with President Lee in the chair.
Nominations for 1911 Class OfficersThe 1911 nominating committee has made the following nominations for class officers; for president, H. Jaques, Jr., R. C. Foster;
Teaching and Advising Staff Awarded at Annual Dinner
Oscars 2015: Snubs