In an email to University President Drew G. Faust last Friday, the Faculty of Arts and Sciences Docket Committee asked for clarification about the scope and timetable of an outside investigation of Harvard’s email search scandal commissioned by Faust.
The committee, which sets the agenda for monthly faculty meetings, also asked Faust to make clear whether or not the findings of the investigation will be shared with faculty and what form such a disclosure might take, according to history professor Maya R. Jasanoff ’96, the vice-chair of the Docket Committee.
The request comes almost two weeks after Faust told faculty at their monthly meeting on April 2 that she had commissioned Boston attorney Michael B. Keating to “verify” the findings of an initial internal investigation of the searches. Though she said in an interview last week that Keating would ultimately report to a special subcommittee of the Harvard Corporation, Faust had not yet clarified what that investigation might look like or when it would occur.
University spokesperson Kevin Galvin said on Sunday that the details of the outside investigation have not yet been determined.
“Conversations between Mr. Keating and the Corporation subcommittee to which he will report are ongoing and the timetable and scope of his review have yet to be finalized,” Galvin said in an emailed statement.
Classics professor Richard F. Thomas, a member of the Faculty Council, said that those findings will not bear much significance unless shared with faculty.
“It can’t really be a fully persuasive document unless its findings are publicized in some way,” Thomas said.
The committee’s email to Faust was co-signed by biological oceanography professor James J. McCarthy and computer science professor Hanspeter Pfister, the committee’s two other faculty members.
Absent from the email was the name Dean of FAS Michael D. Smith, the chair ex officio of the Docket Committee. Smith authorized the secret search of the resident deans’ administrative email accounts last September in the hopes of identifying the source of the leak of what was deemed confidential Administrative Board communications about the Government 1310 cheating case. Smith wrote in a March 11 statement that those searches had been limited to resident deans’ administrative accounts and that no further action was taken after the searches identified the resident dean who had forwarded an internal advising email to two students.
“I think we need to distinguish what happened in September from what happened in March,” Jasanoff said on Friday. “I think that I and a lot of other faculty were very upset to find out what we were told in the March 11 statement was not the whole truth.”
With several College administrators already challenging key aspects of the April 2 statement, senior faculty members said this weekend that top deans had degraded much of their credibility regarding the searches. Even if the searches were carried out with the best intent, only a truly third-party report can now bring transparency to the case, they said.
“I just feel that we really haven’t gotten to the bottom of the conflicting stories yet,” said classics department Chair Mark J. Schiefsky. “It was good to have the apologies at the meeting, but there remain questions of what was done, when, by whom, and possible conflicts with FAS policy.”
Government professor Theda R. Skocpol said that news of the searches has been “deflating” for faculty members, many of whom do not know how to react. Skocpol, like other professors, said that the Keating report will only carry weight if it is completely transparent.
“I think a lot of people feel that there are murky areas and that some of the murkiness is disquieting, so if President Faust can commission something that looks independent and honest and above all thorough, I think that would be helpful if it’s public, but I don’t know if it will be,” said Skocpol, the former dean of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences.
—Staff writer Nicholas P. Fandos can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org. Follow him on Twitter @npfandos.
Letter Cosigned by 32 History Faculty Says Secret Searches Threaten 'Climate of Trust'Thirty-two members of the History Department sent a letter to Dean of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences Michael D. Smith last Thursday, lodging “strong opposition” to Harvard’s decision to secretly search the email accounts of its 16 resident deans and imploring the administration to address what they characterized as a growing gap of trust within the University.
Step Up, President FaustI’ve been giving President Drew G. Faust the benefit of the doubt through the many Harvard scandals over the past year, but her handling of the Resident Dean email search debacle is where I draw the line.
Faculty Meeting Plans to Address Honor Code, Email Searches Not On AgendaEven though a long-awaited discussion on a school-wide honor code will take precedence on the agenda of this month’s Faculty meeting of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences, professors said they still expect to find time to discuss secret email searches uncovered in early March.
Revelation of Second Email Search Contradicts Administrators' Previous Statement
To Rebuild Trust, Hammonds Must ResignSince Hammonds provided misinformation regarding the highly sensitive issue of email searches, and since she violated clear policy regarding those searches, her presence at the helm of the College stands as a roadblock to rebuilding trust between students, faculty, and the administration. For the good of the University, Hammonds must resign.
Email Search Fallout Prompts Dismay Over Privacy, TrustIn response to revelations of a previously undisclosed round of secret email searches announced at a faculty meeting Tuesday, student representatives expressed concern about administrative transparency surrounding email privacy, including the security of the students’ own accounts.